Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40995080›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025

Predicting mortality in intensive care unit patients with CAUTI using an interpretable machine learning model: a retrospective cohort study from MIMIC-IV database.

Longcha Liu, Xueshu Yu, Zhi Chen, Qixia Zhang, Danwen Zhuang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Longcha LiuDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Xueshu YuDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Zhi ChenDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Qixia ZhangDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Danwen ZhuangDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to develop a reliable model for predicting mortality in patients with catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) in intensive care unit (ICU). Methods: The MIMIC-IV database was used for model development and validation in this study. Data from the first 24 h of ICU admission were collected, and 70% of the data were used to train the model and 30% to validate the model. Four machine learning models, including XGBoost, DecisionTree (DT), Logistic Regression (LR) and Random Forest (RF), were used to construct the prediction model. The SHAP method was used to explain the best performance model. Results: A total of 545 patients with CAUTI were finally included. The mortality of ICU patients with CAUTI was 7.89% (43/545). The area under the curve (AUC) of the Logistic regression model was 0.871, which showed better prediction performance among the four models. The DecisionTree machine had limited generalization ability, with an AUC of 0.542 and relatively poor prediction accuracy. The SHAP technique revealed 13 most important predictors of CAUTI in order of importance, among which use of vasoactive drugs,shock index,APSIII score, and concomitant malignancy were identified as variables with high predictive significance. Conclusion: The interpretable prediction model used in this study can help medical staff improve their ability to predict the risk of death in patients with CAUTI in ICU.

Indexed as

CAUTIintensive care unitlogistic regressionmortalitypredictionSHAP

Identifiers

PMID40995080
PMCPMC12454392

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.