ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Predicting mortality in intensive care unit patients with CAUTI using an interpretable machine learning model: a retrospective cohort study from MIMIC-IV database.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A National Collaborative Project to Decrease Healthcare-Associated Infections in Intensive Care Units: Results from Stop Hospital Infection, in Portugal.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to develop a reliable model for predicting mortality in patients with catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) in intensive care unit (ICU). Methods: The MIMIC-IV database was used for model development and validation in this study. Data from the first 24 h of ICU admission were collected, and 70% of the data were used to train the model and 30% to validate the model. Four machine learning models, including XGBoost, DecisionTree (DT), Logistic Regression (LR) and Random Forest (RF), were used to construct the prediction model. The SHAP method was used to explain the best performance model. Results: A total of 545 patients with CAUTI were finally included. The mortality of ICU patients with CAUTI was 7.89% (43/545). The area under the curve (AUC) of the Logistic regression model was 0.871, which showed better prediction performance among the four models. The DecisionTree machine had limited generalization ability, with an AUC of 0.542 and relatively poor prediction accuracy. The SHAP technique revealed 13 most important predictors of CAUTI in order of importance, among which use of vasoactive drugs,shock index,APSIII score, and concomitant malignancy were identified as variables with high predictive significance. Conclusion: The interpretable prediction model used in this study can help medical staff improve their ability to predict the risk of death in patients with CAUTI in ICU.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.