SynthesisFrontiers in nutrition2025
Nutrition literacy assessment in older adults: a scoping review of measurement tools.
Synthesis in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Influence of Parental Lifestyle and Dietary Patterns on Mediterranean Diet Adherence in Children and Adolescents: A Cross-Sectional Study.Nutrients · 2026Article
- Dietary Knowledge and Its Associated Factors Among Patients with Diabetes and Hypertension in Tertiary Hospitals in Dodoma, Tanzania: A Cross-sectional Study.The East African health research journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Nutritional diseases, common among the elderly, are profoundly affected by nutrition literacy. Nutrition literacy influences dietary habits and behaviors; therefore, developing nutrition literacy is essential for alleviating various illnesses and enhancing quality of life. This study sought to perform a scoping review to find and compare techniques for assessing nutrition literacy in older persons and identify any gaps in this area of scholarship. Methods: A comprehensive search of seven internet databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Wanfang, China Biology Medicine disc (CBM), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and VIP Database for Chinese Technical Periodicals (VIP), resulting in 1,995 articles. In addition, additional relevant studies were retrieved from the identified articles' references. Ultimately, 14 publications were included, encompassing a total of 12 nutrition literacy evaluation instruments. Results: The Simplified Nutrition Appetite Questionnaire (SNAQ), and Nutrition Literacy Assessment Tool (NLAT) were identified as unidimensional instruments, while the other tools had multidimensional attributes. Of the 11 instruments assessed for reliability, the Portuguese version of the Mini-Nutritional Assessment (MNA Portuguese Version) was validated exclusively for validity, lacking a reliability evaluation. Moreover, the NLAT underwent just reliability testing, with no validity assessment performed. We observed that current assessment tools have shortcomings in terms of cultural appropriateness and need further validation. Most current techniques primarily focus on fundamental nutritional knowledge, overall nutritional status, and dietary choices, providing wide-ranging applicability. However, the existing assessment tools exhibit limitations regarding their applicability, indicator systems, and assessment content for elderly patients with chronic diseases, inadequately addressing the specific issues associated with these conditions. Conclusion: To address clinical nutritional requirements, it is essential to enhance the cross-cultural validation of tools via multidisciplinary translation teams and adherence to international guidelines, thereby improving their applicability across diverse populations. There is an immediate necessity to develop adaptable and customizable assessment instruments for certain diseases in the senior population. These tools should incorporate indicators of nutritional knowledge relevant to particular diseases, along with dynamic monitoring indicators of nutritional status, to enhance personalized nutritional management support for elderly. The integration of artificial intelligence technology into these tools can enhance their optimization, leading to improved accuracy and effectiveness in clinical nutritional practices for elderly care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.