ArticleFrontiers in aging neuroscience2025
Empathy in mild cognitive impairment: a preliminary clinical comparative study in Southern Switzerland using the interpersonal reactivity index (IRI) and the story-based empathy task (SET).
Article in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) is a transitional stage between normal aging and dementia, frequently associated with subtle deficits in social cognition. Empathy, a core component of social cognition, encompasses both affective and cognitive dimensions and may be compromised even in prodromal phases of neurodegenerative conditions. Despite its clinical relevance, empathy in MCI remains underexplored, and standardized assessment tools are seldom used in routine diagnostics. Theory of mind is another important aspect of social cognition, and, as with empathy, it is unclear how it is affected at the MCI stage. This study aimed to investigate empathy and theory of mind abilities in individuals with MCI, excluding cases attributable to prodromal frontotemporal dementia, using two validated instruments: the Interpersonal reactivity index (IRI) and the Story-based empathy task (SET). Methods: We conducted a case-control study involving 23 individuals with MCI and 25 cognitively healthy controls. All participants completed the IRI, while a subsample (19 MCI patients) also underwent the SET. The clinical group included both amnestic and non-amnestic MCI subtypes, with heterogeneous etiologies. Group comparisons were performed on IRI subscales and SET indices to assess both self-reported empathy traits and performance-based socio-cognitive abilities. Results: The MCI group exhibited significantly lower scores in the IRI subscales of Empathic Concern and Perspective Taking compared to controls, indicating concurrent affective and cognitive empathy impairments. While no significant differences emerged in individual SET subcomponents, the MCI group showed a significantly lower global SET score, suggesting reduced integrative socio-cognitive performance. These findings should be interpreted with caution given the limited sample size and clinical heterogeneity, which make this a preliminary study. Conclusion: These findings provide preliminary evidence of early empathy-related and theory of mind alterations in MCI, supporting the inclusion of social cognition assessments in standard neuropsychological protocols. The combined use of self-report and task-based instruments may enhance early identification of socio-emotional dysfunctions and inform personalized clinical interventions. The preliminary nature of this study is mainly due to the small sample size and the heterogeneous clinical profiles, which limit generalizability but highlight the need for replication in larger cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.