ArticleOsteoarthritis and cartilage open2025
Longitudinal associations between bilateral versus unilateral knee osteoarthritis and physical performance measures.
Article in Osteoarthritis and cartilage open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Bilateral knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is common, but evidence for the effect of bilateral versus unilateral KOA on functional outcomes is conflicting. We aimed to examine the association between bilateral versus unilateral KOA and physical performance measures over two years. Methods: Our cohort included adults with symptomatic, radiographic KOA. Study assessments at baseline, 12 and 24 months included the 30-s chair sit-to-stand task (CST) and 40-m walk (40 MW). We defined bilateral KOA as Kellgren-Lawrence grade ≥2 and Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Pain Scale ≥17/100 in both knees. We used linear mixed models to (1) assess the cross-sectional association between the presence of bilateral versus unilateral KOA at each timepoint and performance measures, and (2) assess the association between bilateral versus unilateral KOA at baseline and longitudinal changes in performance measures. Models were adjusted for clinical and demographic covariates. Results: 101 participants were included. At baseline, 43/101 (43 %) had bilateral KOA. In adjusted models, bilateral, versus unilateral, KOA was associated with 1.0 fewer stands on the CST (95 % CI: 2.2-0.1), and a 0.03 m/s slower 40 MW (95 % CI: 0.10-0.04). Average 2-year change in CST was -0.6 stands in those with baseline bilateral KOA and -0.7 in those with unilateral KOA (between-group difference, 0.1 stands (95 % CI: 1.7-1.8)). The baseline bilateral KOA group had greater worsening in 40 MW time (between-group difference -0.10 m/s (95 % CI: -0.20-0.00)). Conclusions: We did not find clinically significant associations between bilateral vs unilateral KOA and performance on two physical performance tasks over two years of follow-up in this cohort study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.