ArticleAustralasian journal of ultrasound in medicine2025
Development of a Novel Machine Learning Model for Automatic Assessment of Quality of Transvaginal Ultrasound Images From Multi-Annotator Labels.
Article in Australasian journal of ultrasound in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The problem with the 'truth': rethinking ground truth for artificial intelligence in endometriosis diagnosis.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Development of a Novel Machine Learning Model for Automatic Assessment of Quality of Transvaginal Ultrasound Images From Multi-Annotator Labels.Australasian journal of ultrasound in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Accurate diagnosis of pathology from ultrasound images is reliant upon images of a suitable diagnostic quality being acquired. This study aimed to create a novel machine learning model to automatically assess transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) image quality for gynaecological ultrasound. Method: Six imaging professionals (two sonographers, two gynaecological sonologists and two radiologists) assigned a quality score to 150 TVUS images from 50 cases (50 uterus images and 100 ovary images). Images were given a score of 1-4 (1-reject/image inaccurate, 2-poor quality, 3-suboptimal quality or 4-optimal quality). As variation existed between the scores assigned by the labellers, we framed this problem as a multi-annotator noisy label problem. To address this, a new machine learning architecture was developed, combining a weighted ensemble algorithm to estimate consensus labels and a multi-axis vision transformer (MaxViT) to handle noisy labels, improving model accuracy in predicting image quality. Forty cases (120 images) were used for model training, while the remaining 10 cases (30 images) were reserved as a test set for model evaluation. Results: The novel machine learning architecture we created was able to successfully determine image quality with a validation accuracy of 80% and a macro average recall of 77%. This significantly improved upon the 57% accuracy of the baseline machine learning method (ResNet50). The MaxViTs were able to outperform human performance in most cases, with an accuracy of 80% surpassing four of the six human labellers. Conclusions: This novel machine learning model offers an automated method of assessing the quality of TVUS images. The tool has the potential to provide real-time feedback to those performing TVUS, reduce the need for repeated imaging, and improve the diagnosis of gynaecological pathology.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.