ArticleJournal of advanced nursing2026
Beyond AIC: An Interpretive Descriptive Qualitative Study of Youth Experiences and Perceptions of Living With Type 2 Diabetes.
Article in Journal of advanced nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond AIC: An Interpretive Descriptive Qualitative Study of Youth Experiences and Perceptions of Living With Type 2 Diabetes.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Article
- A Virtual Living Lab Platform Codeveloped for Mental Health in Youth-Onset Type 2 Diabetes (BrightSpark Care Lab): Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo generate an in-depth understanding of the perceptions and experiences of individuals with youth-onset type 2 diabetes (T2D) to inform knowledge translation initiatives and clinical care.
designInterpretive descriptive qualitative study.
methodsIndividuals were eligible to participate if they received a T2D diagnosis on or before 18 years of age, resided in Manitoba, and were between 10 and 25 years of age at the time of data collection. Twenty-two individuals (13 females, 7 males, 2 prefer not to indicate gender; mean age = 19.3 years) participated in 22 semi-structured interviews (mean length: 29:01 min) remotely using Zoom video conferencing software or by telephone. Data were analysed using inductive thematic analysis.
resultsFour themes were generated: (1) Low public knowledge, misconceptions, and stigma impact youth experiences including those of diagnosis, disclosure, treatment, and supports; (2) shared familial experiences impacts perception of the future; (3) mental and emotional wellness is critically important but requires more attention; and (4) T2D carries unanticipated positive and negative impacts for youth.
conclusionsFindings illustrate the complex interrelationships between public and personal conceptions of T2D, stigma, and T2D navigation, emphasising the centrality of emotional and mental well-being to participants' T2D experiences and management. This representation of experiences and perceptions of youth onset T2D offers direction for holistic and youth-centred research and care and highlights areas where further mental health and educational resources would be beneficial. PATIENT AND PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: The knowledge translation resource being developed from this study involves input from patient and public partners.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.