Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40996586›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2026

Association of potentially inappropriate medications with rehospitalisation and death within three months in older patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Isabella Muzzarelli, Vera Isabel Neumeier, Michael Gagesch, Wiebke Rösler, Andrea Rahel Burch

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Isabella Muzzarelli *Hospital Pharmacy, University Hospital of Zurich, 8006, Zurich, Switzerland.
Vera Isabel Neumeier *Hospital Pharmacy, University Hospital of Zurich, 8006, Zurich, Switzerland.
Michael GageschUniversity Clinic of Aging Medicine, Zurich City Hospital, 8037, Zurich, Switzerland.
Wiebke RöslerDepartment of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Zurich, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Andrea Rahel BurchHospital Pharmacy, University Hospital of Zurich, 8006, Zurich, Switzerland. andrea.burch@usz.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2270-4722

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPotentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) are medications with an unfavourable risk-benefit profile for patients aged ≥ 65 years. Currently, several screening tools are available and are used in clinical practice to identify PIMs.

aimOur objective was to systematically synthesize the available evidence on the association between potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs), as identified by various screening tools including STOPP/START and the Beers Criteria, and the outcomes of rehospitalization and mortality within three months in older patients.

methodAdhering to Cochrane standards, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the outcomes of patients aged 65 years and older, comparing those with at least one PIM identified by any explicit screening tool to those without PIMs. Primary outcomes were readmission and/or death within three months. The databases of Embase, MEDLINE, and CENTRAL were searched for retrospective as well as prospective observational studies published between 1991 and May 17 2024. The risk of bias was assessed for all included studies.

resultsIn total, 1,642 studies were identified through the systematic search. Nine observational studies were included in this review. Our analysis revealed a statistically significant association between the overall presence of PIMs and rehospitalisation; odds ratio (OR) 1.47 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02 to 2.13, p = 0.045]. While stratification according to STOPP/START criteria yielded a statistically significant OR of 1.84 [CI 1.08 to 3.12, p = 0.024; n = 5], no statistically significant difference was seen according to Beers list [OR 1.25, CI 0.86 to 1.81, p = 0.235; n = 5]. Furthermore, no significant association was found between PIMs and mortality in either the overall analysis or the stratification according to the Beers and STOPP/START criteria. The risk of bias in the included studies was moderate to serious, and the certainty of evidence was very low.

conclusionThe use of PIM screening tools during medication evaluations may reduce the risk of rehospitalisation and potentially lower mortality in older patients. However, further studies are warranted to confirm the association with adverse outcomes.

Indexed as

Inappropriate PrescribingPatient ReadmissionPotentially Inappropriate Medication ListAgedAged, 80 and overHumansMortalityObservational Studies as TopicBeers criteriaGeriatricsHumansInappropriate prescribing

Identifiers

PMID40996586
PMCPMC12992462

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.