Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40996705›Full record

ArticleDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation2025

The impact of curation errors in the PDBBind Database on machine learning predictions of protein-protein binding affinity.

Jason D Gans, Justin E Miller, Esen Sokullu, Nileena Velappan, Ramesh K Jha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jason D GansBioscience Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, 87545, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7151-3108
Justin E MillerBioscience Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, 87545, USA.
Esen SokulluBioscience Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, 87545, USA.
Nileena VelappanBioscience Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, 87545, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4488-9126
Ramesh K JhaBioscience Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, 87545, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5904-3441

Funding

Laboratory Directed Research and Development #20240876PRD4
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The PDBBind database has been widely utilized for the computational prediction of protein-protein binding affinities. While the accuracy of the PDBBind-curated equilibrium dissociation constants (KD) has been reported for the protein-ligand subset of the PDBBind database, the curation accuracy has not been reported for the protein-protein subset. Here, we present a detailed manual analysis for the subset of PDBBind records with PubMed Central Open Access primary publications and find that ~19% of these records had KD values that were not supported by their primary publications. The impact of these putative curation errors on the machine learning-based prediction of KD from experimental protein-protein 3D structures was evaluated and correcting the curation errors improved the Pearson correlation coefficient between measured and random forest-predicted log10(KD) values by ~8 percentage points. This finding underscores the importance of dataset accuracy for computational modelling and highlights the need for more stringent curation processes when extracting information from the scientific literature.

Indexed as

Databases, ProteinData CurationMachine LearningProteinsProtein BindingProteins

Identifiers

PMID40996705
PMCPMC12462375

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.