ArticleTurkish journal of haematology : official journal of Turkish Society of Haematology2026
Validation and Modeling of Flow Cytometric CD36 Coefficient of Variation Analysis in the Diagnosis of Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome
Article in Turkish journal of haematology : official journal of Turkish Society of Haematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Comment on “Validation and Modeling of Flow Cytometric CD36 Coefficient of Variation (CV) Analysis in the Diagnosis of Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes”Turkish journal of haematology : official journal of Turkish Society of Haematology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) constitutes a group of clonal hematopoietic disorders in which flow cytometry plays a limited yet evolving role in diagnosis. Recent studies have identified the CD36 coefficient of variation (CV) as a potential marker of dyserythropoiesis. This study aimed to validate the diagnostic utility of the CD36 CV in a local cohort, establish control-based cut-off values, and assess the added value of the CD36 CV when integrated into the Ogata score for improved detection of lower-risk MDS. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, 82 patients who underwent bone marrow aspiration for unexplained cytopenia were analyzed using multiparametric flow cytometry, cytogenetics, and morphological assessment. CD36 CV values were obtained from erythroid precursors and diagnostic thresholds were determined based on the distribution of values in the control group. Diagnostic models included CD36 CV alone, a combined binary model with the Ogata score, and an expanded five-point scoring system. Results: CD36 CV values were numerically higher in patients with MDS (mean: 75.81) compared to the control group (mean: 65.84), although the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.099). For low-risk MDS, the 75 Conclusion: Incorporating the CD36 CV into flow cytometric evaluation enhances diagnostic specificity for lower-risk MDS without requiring additional antibody panels. This locally validated marker may improve diagnostic accuracy when combined with myelomonocytic immunophenotyping. Standardization across institutions remains necessary for broader applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.