ArticleDiabetes care2025
Development and Internal Validation of the Multiethnic Type 2 Diabetes Outcomes Model for the U.S. (DOMUS).
Article in Diabetes care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Study of the Relationship Between Serum Albumin-Corrected Fructosamine and Type 2 Diabetic Retinopathy.Journal of diabetes research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe objective of this study was to develop and internally validate a mathematical model of the relationships between patient clinical and social risk factors and outcomes using data from a multiethnic population with type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND
methodsWe constructed an incidence cohort of all adults (18 years or older) with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes in the Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC) health care system between 2005 and 2016 (n = 129,000), following patients for at least 1 year, but up to 12 years. Using this cohort, we modeled 17 distinct diabetes-related outcomes related to micro- and macrovascular disease, as well as atrial fibrillation, depression, dementia, relevant biomarkers, and mortality.
resultsData were randomly split into 50%, 25%, and 25% samples to perform model estimation, calibration, and validation, respectively. Empirical and simulated data were similar for the events and biomarkers, but some factors required calibration. After calibration, they closely aligned with empirical estimates.
conclusionsThe resulting Diabetes Outcome Model of the U.S. (DOMUS) is a major step forward in understanding diabetes progression and the role of social determinants of health. This model can be used by scientists, policymakers, and health system managers to better understand how choices can affect population health and health disparities, including the broad diversity of U.S. races and ethnicities. Moreover, this model can be used to realize longer-term comparative effectiveness in cost-effectiveness analyses for diabetes management in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.