Trial reportScientific reports2025
The effect of individual nutrition counseling on the life quality and weight in patients with gastric cancer following total gastrectomy.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The primary objective of this research is to investigate the influence of individual nutritional counseling (INC) on the quality of life (QOL) of gastric cancer patients who have undergone total gastrectomy. This prospective randomized controlled trial included 59 patients who were randomly assigned to either an intervention group, which received INC, or a control group. QOL data were collected by using the EORTC QOL-C30 and QOL-STO22 questionnaire. Weight and BMI were measured at discharge and two-month follow-up. The intervention group demonstrated significant improvements in several dimensions compared to the control group, including global health score and reduction in weight and BMI loss (all p < 0.01). This study highlights INC as an essential aspect of comprehensive care provided for patients following total gastrectomy. The intervention has been proven to be highly effective in enhancing QOL, physical function, and psychological well-being, as well as in mitigating the adverse effects of post-surgical complications. QOL was measured using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-STO22 questionnaires, and weight and BMI were assessed at discharge and two months postoperatively. Patients in the intervention group showed significant improvements in overall health, physical functioning, fatigue, anorexia, and dysphagia (all p < 0.01), as well as in nausea and vomiting, reflux, and eating restrictions (all p < 0.05). The intervention group also had significantly less reduction in body weight and BMI (p < 0.001). These findings support the integration of INC as a vital component of postoperative care to improve physical, psychological, and nutritional outcomes in patients undergoing total gastrectomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.