ArticleScientific reports2025
MRI grading of lumbar disc herniation based on AFFM-YOLOv8 system.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Deep learning for the diagnosis of lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medical imaging · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) serves as the clinical gold standard for diagnosing lumbar disc herniation (LDH). This multicenter study was to develop and clinically validate a deep learning (DL) model utilizing axial T2-weighted lumbar MRI sequences to automate LDH detection, following the Michigan State University (MSU) morphological classification criteria. A total of 8428 patients (100000 axial lumbar MRIs) with spinal surgeons annotating the datasets per MSU criteria, which classifies LDH into 11 subtypes based on morphology and neural compression severity, were analyzed. A DL architecture integrating adaptive multi-scale feature fusion titled as AFFM-YOLOv8 was developed. Model performance was validated against radiologists' annotations using accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and Cohen's κ (95% confidence intervals). The proposed model demonstrated superior diagnostic performance with a 91.01% F1-score (3.05% improvement over baseline) and 3% recall enhancement across all evaluation metrics. For surgical indication prediction, strong inter-rater agreement was achieved with senior surgeons (κ = 0.91, 95% CI 90.6-91.4) and residents (κ = 0.89, 95% CI 88.5-89.4), reaching consensus levels comparable to expert-to-expert agreement (senior surgeons: κ = 0.89; residents: κ = 0.87). This study establishes a DL framework for automated LDH diagnosis using large-scale axial MRI datasets. The model achieves clinician-level accuracy in MUS-compliant classification, addressing key limitations of prior binary classification systems. By providing granular spatial and morphological insights, this tool holds promise for standardizing LDH assessment and reducing diagnostic delays in resource-constrained settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.