ArticleFrontiers of optoelectronics2025
Advancing intraoperative cerebral blood flow monitoring: integrating imaging photoplethysmography and laser speckle contrast imaging in neurosurgery.
Article in Frontiers of optoelectronics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- EPI-Sense: an integrated hemodynamic sensing and analysis system for early pressure injury warning.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Imaging photoplethysmography reveals differences in the reactions of cerebral and systemic hemodynamics to infusion of vasoactive drugs.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intraoperative assessment of cerebral hemodynamics is crucial for the success of neurosurgical interventions. This study evaluates the potential of laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI) and imaging photoplethysmography (IPPG) for contactless perfusion monitoring during neurosurgery. Despite similarities in their hardware requirements, these techniques rely on fundamentally different principles: light scattering for LSCI and light absorption for IPPG. Comparative experiments were conducted using animals (rats) when assessing the reaction of cerebral hemodynamics to adenosine triphosphate infusion. The results show different spatial and temporal characteristics of the techniques: LSCI predominantly visualizes blood flow in large venous vessels, especially in the sagittal and transverse sinuses, showing a pronounced modulation associated with the heart that cannot be explained by venous blood flow alone. In contrast, IPPG quantifies the dynamics of perfusion changes in the parenchyma, showing minimal signal in large venous vessels. We propose that LSCI signal modulation is significantly influenced by the movement of vessel walls in response to mechanical pressure waves propagating through the parenchyma from nearby arteries. A novel algorithm for LSCI data processing was developed based on this interpretation, producing perfusion indices that align well with IPPG measurements. This study demonstrates that the complementary nature of these techniques (LSCI is sensitive to blood cells displacements, while IPPG detects a change in their density) makes their combined application particularly valuable for comprehensive assessment of cerebral hemodynamics during neurosurgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.