ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2025
Integrating gene expression data via weighted multiple kernel ridge regression improved accuracy of genomic prediction.
Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Conditionally Significant eQTL and TWAS Analyses Identify MsRD26 as a Major Candidate Positive Regulator of Salt Tolerance in Medicago sativa L.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- From machine learning to digital twin integration for livestock production and research.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGene expression profiles hold potentially valuable information for the prediction of breeding values and phenotypes. However, in practical breeding programs, most reference population individuals typically have only genomic data, lacking transcriptomic data. Predicting gene expression based on genetic markers and integrating the genetically predicted gene expression data into genomic prediction may offer a potential solution.
resultsThis study extends kernel ridge regression (KRR) to weighted multiple kernel ridge regression (WMKRR), which integrates genomic data and transcriptomic data predicted from genetic markers through a multiple kernel learning (MKL) approach. We evaluated the predictive ability of WMKRR compared to traditional genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) and a combined genomic and transcriptomic best linear unbiased prediction (GTBLUP) in both genotype feature selection and non-feature selection scenarios in two datasets: (i) 3305 simulated data based on the Cattle Genotype-Tissue Expression (CattleGTEx) dataset, (ii) 5515 real dairy cattle data. Our results show that WMKRR yielded higher predictive abilities than GBLUP And GTBLUP in both simulated And real dairy cattle data. For the simulated data based on CattleGTEx, WMKRR achieved an average improvement in predictive ability of 1.12% And 1.13% over GBLUP And GTBLUP, respectively, under the non-feature selection scenario, And 3.17% And 3.23%, respectively, under the feature selection scenario. For the real dairy cattle data, in cross-validation, WMKRR improved over GBLUP And GTBLUP by An average of 5.56% And 7.23%, respectively, without feature selection, And by 5.66% And 6.40%, respectively, with feature selection. In forward validation, WMKRR improved over GBLUP And GTBLUP by An average of 5.68% And 8.41%, respectively, without feature selection, And by 4.66% And 7.06%, respectively, with feature selection.
conclusionsOur result demonstrates that the WMKRR model, which integrates genomic and genetically predicted transcriptomic data, achieves better prediction performance compared to traditional genomic prediction models. This study showed the potential of enhanced genomic breeding application using omics data with no further omics sequencing cost.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.