SynthesisStem cell research & therapy2025
Clinical efficacy and safety of somatic cell therapy for chronic low back pain: evidence from the pooled randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Stem cell research & therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundChronic low back pain (CLBP) is a highly prevalent and burdensome musculoskeletal disorder globally, significantly impacting individuals' health and quality of life. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the somatic cell therapies in treating CLBP.
methodsAll relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the Cochrane, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched for the meta-analysis. The outcomes consisted of Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores, and the incidence of serious adverse events (SAE). Dichotomous outcomes were described as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), while continuous data were presented as mean difference (MD) with 95% CIs. Statistical analysis was performed with RevMan 5.4 and stata 17 software.
resultsA total of seven RCTs involving 518 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The results showed that somatic cell therapies were effective in terms of VAS scores [MD = -12.04 (-17.35,-6.72)] and ODI scores [MD = -8.03 (-12.84,-3.22)], while not increasing risk of SAE [OR = 0.70 (0.19, 2.64)].
conclusionsOur findings suggested that somatic cell therapy demonstrated significant therapeutic efficacy in the management of CLBP. Future large-scale, multicenter RCTs with extended follow-up durations are warranted to confirm the optimal somatic cell type and dosage regimen for maximal therapeutic benefit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.