ReviewMolecular medicine reports2025
Research advancements regarding the relationship between FBXO2 and malignant tumors (Review).
Review in Molecular medicine reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The ubiquitin‑proteasome system (UPS) acts as a central regulator for a range of protein components, including ubiquitin, ubiquitin‑activating enzyme (E1), ubiquitin‑conjugating enzyme (E2), ubiquitin ligase (E3), the 26S proteasome and deubiquitinating enzyme. These components function in a coordinated manner to facilitate the repair and degradation of proteins. Among the ubiquitinating enzymes, in conjunction with E1‑activating enzymes and E2‑binding enzymes, it attaches to substrates and promotes the transfer of ubiquitin molecules to target proteins. The S‑phase kinase‑associated protein 1 (SKP1)‑Cullin‑F‑box (SCF) complex is one of the E3 ligases involved in cancer progression, and consists of four primary components: i) SKP1; ii) Cullin 1/coiled‑coil domain containing 53; iii) ring box protein 1/RING‑box 1/RING‑box protein HRT1; and iv) F‑box protein (FBP). Each FBP can recognize and bind to a different set of substrates, which determines the specificity of the targets of the SCF complex. In addition to being components of the SCF complex, FBPs participate in processes such as DNA replication, transcription, cell differentiation and cell death. F‑box protein 2 (FBXO2), a member of the human FBP family, functions as a subunit of FBP ubiquitin ligases and is highly expressed in the cytoplasm of eukaryotic cells. FBXO2 is highly expressed in various malignant tumors, and is closely associated with tumor cell proliferation, migration and invasion. The present review presents the composition of the UPS and FBP families and their roles in malignant tumors, with a focus on advancements in research into the relationships between FBXO2 and various malignant tumors, aiming to acquire a more profound understanding of their potential mechanisms in the development of malignant tumors and to offer novel ideas for tumor therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.