ArticleAIDS (London, England)2025
Ethical considerations for research involving pregnant women with HIV and their children.
Article in AIDS (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pregnant and postpartum women with HIV (PPWH) and their children have historically been excluded from certain research in the name of protection. This may, however, inadvertently exacerbate health disparities. While calls for their inclusion have increased, additional practical guidance to achieve this goal is needed. Within this editorial, we provide practical recommendations for enabling PPWH and their children to participate ethically in research by identifying and addressing issues that potentially put them at risk. We ground this discussion in a framework that considers the various vulnerabilities that may exist when involving this population in research. These considerations were further informed by person-centered empirical data collected in Kenya, as well as reviews of the literature. Five key domains of consideration include: prioritizing confidentially, support for appropriate agency in decision-making, broad considerations related to respect for persons, community engagement, and appropriate oversight. We hope that the resulting guidance will inform future research practices, with implications for advancing ethical and inclusive research involving PPWH and their children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.