Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41000051›Full record

ArticleThe Veterinary record2025

Born to run? Racing and training outcomes, population dynamics and traceability of a Thoroughbred birth cohort.

Rebecca Mouncey, Amanda M de Mestre, Kristien L Verheyen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Veterinary record, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rebecca MounceyDepartment of Pathobiology and Population Sciences, Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9850-7878
Amanda M de MestreBaker Institute for Animal Health, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.
Kristien L VerheyenDepartment of Pathobiology and Population Sciences, Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5077-224X

Funding

Horserace Betting Levy Board EPDF 2022-9Horserace Betting Levy Board vet/prj/791Racing FoundationRoyal Veterinary College's Mellon Fund for Equine Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnalyses of industry-level data suggest that around one-third of the UK and Ireland Thoroughbred foal crop fail to enter training. Prospective follow-up of individual horses could provide additional insight, particularly around individuals not attaining specific career milestones.

methodsA Thoroughbred birth cohort was established on stud farms across the UK and Ireland. Training, race performance, sales, export data, destinations and reasons for individuals failing to meet career milestones were collected from stud records, follow-up with owners, stud book and racing authorities' databases, and publicly available data sources to the end of the fourth year of life.

resultsOf 262 foals that were alive at the end of the second year of life, 94.7% (248/262; 95% confidence interval [CI] 91.2‒96.8) were registered with a licensed trainer and 79.0% (207/262; 95% CI 73.7‒83.5) had raced at least once by the end of the follow-up period. Just eight individuals, all of which had been sold as foals and/or yearlings, had an unknown fate or whereabouts. LIMITATIONS: Outcomes for horses exported out of the UK may be underestimated.

conclusionsWastage may be lower than industry-level figures suggest, highlighting important traceability gaps at this level, likely due to the dynamic nature of Thoroughbred populations.

Indexed as

Physical Conditioning, AnimalRunningAnimalsCohort StudiesFemaleHorsesIrelandMalePopulation DynamicsProspective StudiesUnited KingdomequineracingThoroughbredtraceabilitytrainingwastage

Identifiers

PMID41000051
PMCPMC12494123

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.