ArticleFrontiers in physiology2025
Acute effects of blood flow restriction training at various arterial occlusion pressures on muscle activation, blood lactate responses, and RPE in healthy adult males.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of Blood Flow Restriction Training at Different Levels of Arterial Occlusion Pressure on Body Composition and Athletic Performance in Youth Soccer Players: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of sports science & medicine · 2026Trial
- Effects of calcium-regulating pulsed electromagnetic field combined with low-load blood flow restriction training on strength and performance adaptations in adolescent sprinters.Journal of exercise science and fitness · 2026Article
- Article
- Acute neuromuscular, metabolic, and perceptual responses to low-load isokinetic exercise under varying percentages of arterial occlusion pressure.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Reduced task-related quadriceps sEMG and limited functional transfer after 4-week low-load blood flow restriction training: a pilot randomized controlled study.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Blood flow restriction training (BFRT) can induce significant muscle activation and metabolic stress at low loads. However, the acute physiological and perceptual responses to different arterial occlusion pressures (AOPs) remain unclear. This study aimed to examine the effects of varying AOP levels on muscle activation, blood lactate concentration, and ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) during low-load resistance exercise in healthy young males. Methods: Sixteen healthy males (20.4 ± 1.5 years) participated in a single-group, repeated-measures study. Each performed barbell back squats (20% 1RM) under four AOP conditions: 0%, 60%, 70%, and 80% AOP. Muscle activation (%MVC), blood lactate concentrations, and RPE were assessed. One-way and two-way repeated-measures ANOVAs were used to analyze the outcomes across pressure and time conditions. Results: Muscle activation increased significantly at 70% and 80% AOP compared to 0% and 60% (e.g., semitendinosus: F (3, 45) = 15.79, p < 0.001, ηp Conclusion: 70%-80% AOPs elicited greater acute neuromuscular and metabolic responses compared to lower pressures, with 70% AOP achieving similar physiological outcomes as 80% but with lower perceived exertion. These findings provide practical guidance for selecting relative occlusion pressures during BFRT. Further studies are warranted to explore long-term training adaptations at these pressures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.