Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41000134›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal. Imaging methods and practice2025

Low peak oxygen uptake in relation to total heart volume as an early marker of sub-clinical diastolic dysfunction.

Katarina Steding-Ehrenborg, Anders Nelsson, Henrik Engblom, Ellen Ostenfeld, Per M Arvidsson, Martin Magnusson, J Gustav Smith, Håkan Arheden

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Katarina Steding-EhrenborgClinical Physiology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, 221 85  Lund, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7250-6508
Anders NelssonClinical Physiology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, 221 85  Lund, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5203-0258
Henrik EngblomClinical Physiology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, 221 85  Lund, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6424-5646
Ellen OstenfeldClinical Physiology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, 221 85  Lund, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2655-2423
Per M ArvidssonClinical Physiology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, 221 85  Lund, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2262-3562
Martin MagnussonDepartment of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Cardiology, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1710-5936
J Gustav SmithWallenberg Center for Molecular Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6285-9935
Håkan ArhedenClinical Physiology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, 221 85  Lund, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6124-3159

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: Peak oxygen uptake (VO Methods and results: Seventy participants were included: 15 with sub-clinical diastolic dysfunction (defined as showing only 1-2 echocardiographic signs of diastolic dysfunction, not meeting clinical diagnostic criteria), 10 athletes, 15 healthy controls, and 30 heart failure patients (15 HFpEF and 15 HFrEF). VO Conclusion: Subjects with sub-clinical diastolic dysfunction may have an altered relationship between VO

Indexed as

athletescardiac magnetic resonance imagingcardiopulmonary exercise testingdiastolic dysfunctionechocardiographyheart failure

Identifiers

PMID41000134
PMCPMC12459250

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.