Evidence mapPaperPMID 41000194Full record

ReviewHealth psychology and behavioral medicine2025

Behaviour change techniques reported in intervention studies of alcohol and tobacco use: a rapid review.

Anuijan Chandran, Scott Veldhuizen, Kamna Mehra, Terri Rodak, Danial Vagharfard, Michelle Pham, Laurie Zawertailo, Jurgen Rehm, Christian S Hendershot, Peter Selby and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Health psychology and behavioral medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Anuijan ChandranINTREPID Lab, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Scott VeldhuizenINTREPID Lab, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Kamna MehraINTREPID Lab, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Terri RodakCAMH Mental Health Sciences Library, Department of Education, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Danial VagharfardINTREPID Lab, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Michelle PhamINTREPID Lab, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Laurie ZawertailoINTREPID Lab, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Jurgen RehmInstitute of Medical Science, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Christian S HendershotDepartment of Population and Public Health Sciences and Institute for Addiction Science, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Peter SelbyINTREPID Lab, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Nadia MinianINTREPID Lab, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Clinical guidelines recommend addressing alcohol and tobacco use simultaneously, but few providers offer brief alcohol interventions routinely, and these behaviours are often treated separately. While several interventions targeted dual use, there remains a gap in identifying behaviour change techniques (BCTs) designed to modify processes controlling dual use. Objective: To identify commonly used BCTs in interventions targeting both alcohol and tobacco use, their modes of delivery, and explore which BCTs are associated with smoking cessation and/or alcohol reduction. Methods: Following Cochrane recommendations, a rapid review to identify BCTs showing promise for reducing dual use was conducted. Using an eligibility criteria, we retrieved relevant papers from databases and used the Behavioural Change Taxonomy V1 tool to identify BCTs showing promise. Results: Thirty-eight articles of the initial systematic search of 2987 papers met the criteria for full article review. Goal setting, action planning, and pharmacological support were the most common BCTs identified. Most studies (33, 87%) had a low or moderate risk of bias. Of these 33 studies, 13 studies (39%) reported statistically significant outcomes of reduction or cessation in smoking behaviour and alcohol consumption. Face to face (25, 76%) was the most common intervention delivery method. Conclusion: Clinical trials identify goal setting, action planning and problem solving to address the dual use of tobacco and alcohol. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are needed to evaluate the true impact of these programmes. Future studies should minimally include these BCTs and study the interactional effects of these BCTs on the efficacy of the intervention.

Indexed as

alcoholbehaviour change techniquescessationreductionReviewtobacco

Identifiers

PMID41000194
PMCPMC12459161

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.