ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025
Perceptions and Limitations of Free Flap Procedures Among Surgeons in Jordan: A Cross-sectional Study.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Free flap procedures are essential in reconstructive surgery, yet their use is influenced by multiple factors, including infrastructure, training, financial constraints, and surgeon experience. This study explored the perceptions of Jordanian surgeons regarding the limitations of free flap procedures. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among Jordanian surgeons, including plastic surgeons, neurosurgeons, ophthalmologists, orthopedic surgeons, and vascular surgeons. Data were collected through a structured questionnaire, assessing infrastructure, resources, training, education, funding, insurance, and surgeon experience. Statistical analysis was performed using R version 4.2.1, and comparisons between plastic and reconstructive surgeons and other surgical specialists were made using chi-square and independent Results: A survey of 120 surgeons revealed that 70% had access to sufficient resources, but 55% had limited access to specialized tools and concerns about institutional budgeting and equipment maintenance. Additionally, 50% had no formal training in free flap procedures, whereas 40% received training during residency. Financial constraints influenced decision-making, with 53% citing affordability and insurance issues. Experience was a key factor, with 45.8% reporting limited exposure to free flaps and 88% recognizing surgeon expertise as critical to success. Plastic surgeons were more likely to have formal training and greater experience with free flap procedures than other specialists ( Conclusions: The study highlighted challenges in the adoption of free flap procedures in Jordan, such as limited access to specialized tools, inadequate training, financial constraints, and disparities in surgeon experience, emphasizing the need for structured training programs, improved institutional support, and improved insurance policies.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.