Evidence mapPaperPMID 41000459Full record

ArticleBMJ neurology open2025

Real-world use of disease-modifying therapy in persons with multiple sclerosis aged 55 and over.

Mina Stanikić, Anke Salmen, Christian P Kamm, Patrick Roth, Pasquale Calabrese, Chiara Zecca, Claudio Gobbi, Claudia Baum, Benjamin Victor Ineichen, Viktor von Wyl and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ neurology open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mina StanikićDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Zurich Institute of Epidemiology Biostatistics and Prevention, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6477-7164
Anke SalmenDepartment of Neurology, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, NRW, Germany.
Christian P KammDepartment of Neurology, Inselspital Universitatsspital Bern, Bern, BE, Switzerland.
Patrick RothDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zürich, ZH, Switzerland.
Pasquale CalabreseDeptartment of Neurology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, BS, Switzerland.
Chiara ZeccaNeurocenter of Southern Switzerland, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano, Lugano, Switzerland.
Claudio GobbiNeurocenter of Southern Switzerland, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano, Lugano, Switzerland.
Claudia BaumRehabilitation Clinic Zihlschlacht, Zihlschlacht-Sitterdorf, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-0656-4854
Benjamin Victor IneichenDepartment of Clinical Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Viktor von WylDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Zurich Institute of Epidemiology Biostatistics and Prevention, Zürich, Switzerland.
Swiss Multiple Sclerosis Registry

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: As the average age of multiple sclerosis (MS) population rises globally, unclear guidelines on disease-modifying therapy (DMT) use in older persons with MS (pwMS) contribute to increased variability in clinical practice. The factors driving DMT utilisation in this population are not well understood. We explored DMT utilisation patterns in pwMS aged 55 and older enrolled in the Swiss MS Registry (SMSR), a nationwide observational study with voluntary participation. Methods: We conducted an exploratory analysis using data from SMSR participants who had reported DMT status in the most recent follow-up survey and at least once within the previous 3 years. Participants were categorised and compared by current and past DMT use: Results: Among 378 participants (mean age 63.2±6.7 years), 206 (54.5%) reported DMT use: 176 (46.6%) continued the same DMT, 20 (5.3%) switched and 10 (2.6%) newly initiated DMT. Among non-users, 54 (14.3%) had stopped treatment, while the rest did not use DMT during the study period. In participants with regular neurological care, longer MS duration (relative risk (RR)=1.018, 95% CI 1.008 to 1.028) and older age (RR=1.016, 95% CI: 1.001 to 1.032) were associated with higher likelihood of DMT non-use, and participants with primary (RR=1.736, 95% CI: 1.175 to 2.565) and secondary progressive MS (RR=1.423, 95% CI: 1.023 to 1.981) were more likely not to use DMTs compared with relapsing-remitting MS. No significant associations were observed in participants without regular neurological follow-up. Conclusions: Despite unclear efficacy and safety, many older pwMS continue DMT use. Use is primarily associated with relapsing-remitting MS, while age and disease duration show only modest or no association.

Indexed as

EPIDEMIOLOGYMULTIPLE SCLEROSIS

Identifiers

PMID41000459
PMCPMC12458763

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.