ArticleBMJ neurology open2025
Real-world use of disease-modifying therapy in persons with multiple sclerosis aged 55 and over.
Article in BMJ neurology open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Integrative Transcriptomics Uncovers IFN-β Signature and IFITM3 as Putative Molecular Mediator in MS.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: As the average age of multiple sclerosis (MS) population rises globally, unclear guidelines on disease-modifying therapy (DMT) use in older persons with MS (pwMS) contribute to increased variability in clinical practice. The factors driving DMT utilisation in this population are not well understood. We explored DMT utilisation patterns in pwMS aged 55 and older enrolled in the Swiss MS Registry (SMSR), a nationwide observational study with voluntary participation. Methods: We conducted an exploratory analysis using data from SMSR participants who had reported DMT status in the most recent follow-up survey and at least once within the previous 3 years. Participants were categorised and compared by current and past DMT use: Results: Among 378 participants (mean age 63.2±6.7 years), 206 (54.5%) reported DMT use: 176 (46.6%) continued the same DMT, 20 (5.3%) switched and 10 (2.6%) newly initiated DMT. Among non-users, 54 (14.3%) had stopped treatment, while the rest did not use DMT during the study period. In participants with regular neurological care, longer MS duration (relative risk (RR)=1.018, 95% CI 1.008 to 1.028) and older age (RR=1.016, 95% CI: 1.001 to 1.032) were associated with higher likelihood of DMT non-use, and participants with primary (RR=1.736, 95% CI: 1.175 to 2.565) and secondary progressive MS (RR=1.423, 95% CI: 1.023 to 1.981) were more likely not to use DMTs compared with relapsing-remitting MS. No significant associations were observed in participants without regular neurological follow-up. Conclusions: Despite unclear efficacy and safety, many older pwMS continue DMT use. Use is primarily associated with relapsing-remitting MS, while age and disease duration show only modest or no association.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.