Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41000749›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

Model-based and model-free valuation signals in the human brain vary markedly in their relationship to individual differences in behavioral control.

Weilun Ding, Jeffrey Cockburn, Julia Pia Simon, Amogh Johri, Scarlet J Cho, Sarah Oh, Jamie D Feusner, Reza Tadayonnejad, John P O'Doherty

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Weilun DingDivision of Humanities & Social Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA.ORCID 0009-0001-5457-0012
Jeffrey CockburnDivision of Humanities & Social Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2004-8653
Julia Pia SimonDivision of Humanities & Social Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA.ORCID 0009-0007-7205-6694
Amogh JohriDivision of Humanities & Social Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA.ORCID 0009-0006-1460-2901
Scarlet J ChoDivision of Humanities & Social Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0737-7383
Sarah OhDivision of Humanities & Social Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9116-0741
Jamie D FeusnerCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, 250 College St., Toronto, ON, M5T 1R8, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0391-345X
Reza TadayonnejadDivision of Humanities & Social Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4665-6721
John P O'DohertyDivision of Humanities & Social Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0016-3531

Funding

Determining the explanatory utility of computational reinforcement-learning theories of goal-directed and habitual control at behavioral and neural levelsR01MH121089 · NIMH · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI O'DOHERTY, JOHN P · 2019 to 2023
$3.5M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH121089
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human action selection under reinforcement is thought to rely on two distinct strategies: model-free and model-based reinforcement learning. While behavior in sequential decision-making tasks often reflects a mixture of both, the neural basis of individual differences in their expression remains unclear. To investigate this, we conducted a large-scale fMRI study with 179 participants performing a variant of the two-step task. Using both cluster-defined subgroups and computational parameter estimates, we found that the ventromedial prefrontal cortex encodes model-based and model-free value signals differently depending on individual strategy use. Model-based value signals were strongly linked to the degree of model-based behavioral reliance, whereas model-free signals appeared regardless of model-free behavioral influence. Leveraging the large sample, we also addressed a longstanding debate about whether model-based knowledge is incorporated into reward prediction errors or if such signals are purely model-free. Surprisingly, ventral striatum prediction error activity was better explained by model-based computations, while a middle caudate error signal was more aligned with model-free learning. Moreover, individuals lacking both model-based behavior and model-based neural signals exhibited impaired state prediction errors, suggesting a difficulty in building or updating their internal model of the environment. These findings indicate that model-free signals are ubiquitous across individuals, even in those not behaviorally relying on model-free strategies, while model-based representations appear only in those individuals utilizing such a strategy at the behavioral level, the absence of which may depend in part on underlying difficulties in forming accurate model-based predictions.

Identifiers

PMID41000749
PMCPMC12458425

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.