ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025
Breeding values and index creation for health and behavior traits in Labrador Retriever guide dogs.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Genomic breeding values and multi-trait selection indices have significantly advanced genetic improvement in livestock but remain underutilized in guide dog breeding. This study developed a genomically informed selection framework for a population of Labrador Retrievers by integrating health (e.g., dental, ocular, and dermatological conditions) and behavioral (e.g., trainability, distraction level, pace) traits into a "Behavior Score," "Health Score," and "Total Score" index by applying Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (GBLUP) to estimate breeding values. Results: Phenotypic and genotypic data were collected from 844 dogs over 26 years at The Seeing Eye guide dog school. Predictive performance was evaluated via five-fold cross-validation and correlation-based metrics. Results showed that some dentition related health traits exhibited moderate to high Area Under Receiving Operating Characteristic (AUROC) values (0.79-0.87), indicating potential for immediate use for genetic improvement. In contrast, most other health traits demonstrated weak to moderate predictive accuracy. Behavioral traits exhibited lower predictive accuracy but showed a stronger association with training success. Models were commonly unable to correctly classify individuals for binary or ordinal traits yet performed well in ranking individuals, likely due to lower heritability or strong environmental influences of traits or limitations of the dataset itself. The behavior-focused Total Score (AUROC ~0.72) outperformed health-based indices as a fixed effect in predicting breeding success despite the weaker predictive ability of individual behavioral traits. Incorporating parental scores as fixed effects modestly improved breeding values for success, indicating the importance of integrating additional data sources where available. Discussion: While these findings underscore the utility of genomic selection for guide dog breeding, they also highlight constraints stemming from small, genetically homogeneous populations and variable phenotyping. Ultimately, we provide the first usable individual and multi-trait genomic approaches to enhance both health and performance outcomes in working dog programs and a foundation to expand upon the reference population and behavioral trait assessment to improve prediction accuracy in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.