Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41001235›Full record

ArticleBMJ public health2025

Trends in use of alcohol-free or low alcohol drinks in attempts to reduce alcohol consumption in Great Britain, 2020-2024: a population-based study.

Vera Buss, Dimitra Kale, Melissa Oldham, Lion Shahab, Abigail Stevely, Inge Kersbergen, Jamie Brown

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Vera BussBehavioural Science and Health, UCL, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9963-8693
Dimitra KaleBehavioural Science and Health, UCL, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8845-7114
Melissa OldhamBehavioural Science and Health, UCL, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5353-9152
Lion ShahabBehavioural Science and Health, UCL, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4033-442X
Abigail StevelySchool of Medicine and Population Health, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Inge KersbergenSchool of Medicine and Population Health, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8799-8963
Jamie BrownBehavioural Science and Health, UCL, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2797-5428

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Sales and availability of alcohol-free and low alcohol drinks have increased in the UK since 2020. This study aimed to assess trends in the use of alcohol-free and low alcohol drinks to reduce alcohol consumption among people who drink at increasing and higher risk in Great Britain. The study compared trajectories across different subgroups from 2020 to 2024. Methods: Data were drawn from the Smoking and Alcohol Toolkit Study, which surveys adults monthly across Great Britain about their drinking behaviour. The study included 9397 adults with an AUDIT-C score of 5 or above who attempted to reduce their alcohol consumption in the past year. The analysis used regression analyses to assess time trends in using alcohol-free and low alcohol drinks to cut down overall and among subgroups (eg, gender and age), and in using evidence-based support compared with alcohol-free and low alcohol drinks in attempts to cut down alcohol consumption. Results: The proportion reporting the use of alcohol-free and low alcohol drinks to reduce alcohol consumption increased from 35.0% (95% confidence interval (CI): 31.8, 38.4) in October 2020 to 43.9% (95% CI: 40.9, 46.9) in August 2024 in serious attempts and from 25.5% (95% CI: 23.2, 28.0) to 38.8% (95% CI: 37.2, 40.4) in any attempt to cut down. Among subgroups, trajectories were mostly comparable. Noticeably, older adults first had lower prevalence of using alcohol-free and low alcohol drinks than young and middle-aged adults but had larger increases over time. While the proportion of participants using alcohol-free and low alcohol drinks in attempts to cut down consumption increased, the proportion using neither alcohol-free/low alcohol drinks nor evidence-based support decreased, and the proportion using evidence-based support, either alone or in combination with alcohol-free/low alcohol drinks, remained low. Conclusion: The growing use of alcohol-free/low alcohol drinks to reduce alcohol consumption among people at risk of increasing and higher risk drinking in Great Britain highlights the urgent need for more research to establish their effectiveness for alcohol reduction and to inform public health policy. While the use of alcohol-free/low alcohol drinks to cut down rose, the use of evidence-based support remained limited.

Indexed as

Cross-Sectional StudiesPrevalencePublic HealthSociodemographic Factorstrends

Identifiers

PMID41001235
PMCPMC12458652

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.