Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41001244›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of women's health2025

Unlocking Success: The Optimal Gonadotrophin Starting Point for Luteal-Phase Stimulation in IVF Patients with Normal Responses.

Xinyu Nie, Qi Wang, Mengmeng Xu, Rulin Dai, Bo Pang, Cong Hu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xinyu NieReproductive Medicine Center, Prenatal Diagnosis Center, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0009-3970-5108
Qi WangReproductive Medicine Center, Prenatal Diagnosis Center, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, People's Republic of China.
Mengmeng XuDepartment of Rehabilitation medicine, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, People's Republic of China.
Rulin DaiReproductive Medicine Center, Prenatal Diagnosis Center, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, People's Republic of China.
Bo PangDepartment of Cardiology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-1667-4846
Cong HuReproductive Medicine Center, Prenatal Diagnosis Center, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-8595-4713

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To analyze and discover the optimal gonadotrophin (Gn) starting point for luteal-phase stimulation (LPS) in in vitro fertilization (IVF) Patients with normal ovarian response (NOR). Patients and Methods: A total of 199 IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles performed at the Reproductive Center of the First Hospital of Jilin University from January 1, 2021, to December 31, 2023, were recruited in the study. Of these, 121 cycles followed the follicular phase ovarian stimulation (FPS) (119 cases of adding antagonists), while 78 cycles adhered to the LPS protocol. The LPS group was divided into three subgroups based on the timing of Gn initiation: early, mid-, and late LPS. Comparisons were made between the LPS and FPS groups, as well as among the three subgroups, regarding Gn duration, total Gn dose, number of oocytes retrieved, number of embryos, rate of good-quality embryos, blastocyst formation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, cumulative pregnancy rate, live birth rate and cumulative live birth rate. Results: The rate of high-quality embryos in the late luteal phase was significantly higher than that in the early luteal group and slightly higher than that in the mid-luteal group. The clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate of the late luteal group were slightly higher than those of the early and mid-luteal group, and were not significantly different from those of the FPS group. Conclusion: Initiating Gn stimulation during the late luteal-phase appears to be the optimal timing in NOR patients.

Indexed as

follicular phase ovarian stimulationluteal phase ovarian stimulationnormal ovarian responsepregnancy outcometiming of gonadotropin initiation

Identifiers

PMID41001244
PMCPMC12457082

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.