ArticleCureus2025
Feasibility of Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment for Low Back Pain in Rural Chimaltenango, Guatemala: A Pilot Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Untangling the Osteopathic Gordian Knot: Reconceptualized Principles for Sustainable and Contemporary Clinical Practice-A Conceptual Perspective.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Low back pain (LBP) is a global health issue that primarily affects underserved communities with limited access to healthcare. Osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) offers non-pharmacological, hands-on interventions that align with its core principle of holistic care. However, little is known about the feasibility and perception of OMT in rural Chimaltenango, Guatemala. This pilot study assesses the feasibility, effectiveness, and participant perception of osteopathic principles in managing LBP complaints. Methods Adult participants experiencing LBP were recruited by the research team during Kansas City University College of Osteopathic Medicine's (KCUCOM) global health mission trip, following their one-day primary care visit. Pre- and post-treatment Visual Analog Scale scores (VAS), Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (ODQ), and modified Osteopathic Survey of Health Care in America (OSTEOSURV) surveys were used in the study to assess pain, activities of daily living, satisfaction, and awareness of OMT. Manipulative techniques were tailored based on the participants' complaints and delivered by a trained fourth-year medical student under the supervision of an osteopathic physician. Results The data showed that 62.5% (n = 5/8) of participants reported a baseline pain score of VAS ≥ 8. Post-treatment, the majority, 75% (n = 6/8), reported greater than 50% pain relief, and 12.5% (n = 1/8) were pain-free (VAS = 0). All participants (100%, n = 8/8) were unfamiliar with OMT before the session. However, 75% (n = 6/8) reported satisfaction with the treatment following manipulation. Conclusion OMT is a feasible and acceptable modality for LBP management in rural Guatemala. These findings support further investigation that includes a larger sample size and the possibility for future integration of osteopathic care into global health outreach, particularly for under-resourced populations that lack access to conventional pain management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.