ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Safety and efficacy evaluation of low-dose of esketamine combined with propofol for painless gastroscopy: a single-center, randomized, double-blind, parallel controlled clinical trial.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Propofol combined with sufentanil is the most commonly used anesthesia regimen for painless gastroscopy in China. However, this combination carries a higher risk of circulatory and respiratory depression. Esketamine, with its strong analgesic and sympathetic excitatory effects, may be a safer alternative. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of propofol-sufentanil versus propofol-esketamine for painless gastroscopy in adults. Methods: 120 participants were randomly assigned to four groups: PS (propofol 2 mg/kg + sufentanil 0.1 μg/kg), PE1 (propofol 2 mg/kg + esketamine 0.05 mg/kg), PE2 (propofol 2 mg/kg + esketamine 0.1 mg/kg), and PE3 (propofol 2 mg/kg + esketamine 0.2 mg/kg). The primary outcome was the incidence of reflex cough during gastroscopy insertion. Secondary outcomes included hemodynamic changes, pulse oxygen saturation, induction time, recovery time, discharge time, propofol consumption, and the occurrence of adverse events. Results: There was no significant difference in reflex cough, body movement response, or propofol injection pain between the PS, PE2, and PE3 groups, but these incidences were significantly lower than in the PE1 group ( Conclusion: Considering the superior safety and efficacy observed in the PE2 group, we recommend the combination of 2 mg/kg propofol and 0.1 mg/kg esketamine as the optimal anesthesia for painless gastroscopy. This combination provides several benefits, including reduced reflex cough, stable hemodynamics, and faster recovery, making it a valuable clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.