ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2025
Providing a rest stop during transportation affects the respiratory bacterial microbiota of beef cattle.
Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Bovine respiratory disease (BRD) is a significant health concern in beef cattle production, leading to substantial economic losses. In North America, beef cattle are frequently transported over long distances for placement into feedlots. The respiratory microbiota of cattle, including pathogens, can change after feedlot entry. However, there is limited information on how bacteria are impacted when cattle are offloaded for a rest stop during transportation. Results: This study investigated the effects of a rest stop during transportation on the nasopharyngeal (NP) microbiota of beef cattle. Two separate trials (N = 80 calves per trial) were conducted with treatment groups assigned to rest stop durations of 12 h (Study 1) and 8 h (Study 2), being compared to control animals without a rest stop. In Study 1, cattle were acclimated to a feedlot prior to transportation while in Study 2, cattle were unacclimated. Following transportation and a rest interval, calves were placed into a feedlot and sampled by NP swab periodically for 28 days. Across treatments and time, the most abundant genera included Conclusion: Based solely on the increased abundance of BRD-associated bacteria, providing a rest stop during transportation may be a risk factor for BRD. However, it was not possible to associate rest stop-induced changes in microbiota with disease outcome due to a low incidence of BRD. Further evaluation using large-scale studies will help define the impact of a rest stop during transportation, on BRD pathogens and incidence in feedlots.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.