ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Correlates of long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) use among young women in Southern Africa: a secondary analysis from HPTN 082.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02732730 (Uptake and Adherence to Daily Oral PrEP as a Primary Prevention Strategy for Young African Women), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Uptake and Adherence to Daily Oral PrEP as a Primary Prevention Strategy for Young African Women: A Vanguard Study
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Long-acting reversible contraception (LARCs), including intrauterine devices (IUDs), injectables, and implants, are highly effective in preventing unintended pregnancies but LARC use rates are low among African adolescents and young women (AGYW). Understanding factors associated with LARC uptake and continuation among African AGYW may provide insights into strategies to promote LARC use. Methods: We conducted a secondary data analysis from the HIV Prevention Trials Network (HPTN 082) pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) study, which enrolled 451 AGYW in Zimbabwe and South Africa ages 16-25 years, who reported vaginal or anal sex in the prior month, and reported PrEP interest (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02732730). Contraception and contraceptive counseling were offered at enrollment and visits at 4, 8, 13, 26, and 39 weeks post enrollment, with follow-up through 52 weeks. The outcome variable was any LARC use, defined as copper or hormonal IUDs, injectable contraceptives, and implants. We performed descriptive analyses and regression models to assess contraceptive use patterns and characteristics associated with LARC use and condomless sex. Results: Overall, 60% (299/499) of AGYW adopted a LARC method at enrollment and 78% (234/299) persisted on a LARC method during follow up. Among the 449 women who used contraception at enrollment and/or during follow-up, 38 (8.4%) switched between non-LARC to LARC and 34 (7.5%) discontinued contraception at some point during the study. AGYW not using a LARC at enrollment were more likely to switch contraceptive method through week 39 compared to those already using a LARC (32.7% vs. 14.7%, respectively; p-value<0.001). Factors significantly associated with choosing a LARC method were prior pregnancy [adjusted odds ratio [aOR]:2.46; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.59-3.79; p<0.01], and comfort talking to close friends about sexual relationships [aOR:1.82; 95% CI:1.02-3.23; p=0.04]. Consistent condom users were less likely to choose a LARC method [aOR:0.27; 95% CI:0.19-0.39; p<0.01]. Conclusion: Contraceptive counseling and offering LARC methods with HIV PrEP was associated with a majority of African AGYW selecting a LARC method. Peer support is important in facilitating LARC use and the high contraceptive efficacy of LARC should be discussed with AGYW using condoms for contraception. Contraceptive counseling and promotion of LARCs should be integrated with PrEP delivery for African AGYW.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.