ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Barriers and Facilitators of Expedited Partner Therapy in U.S. Emergency Departments: A Nationwide Qualitative Study.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Expedited partner therapy (EPT) is recommended for sex partners who might not seek care otherwise. Despite its high relevance in the management of sexually transmitted infections (STIs), EPT has had limited uptake in emergency departments (ED). We assessed barriers to and facilitators that could assist in increasing use of EPT in the EDs. Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews of 18 ED medical directors and key medical personnel from institutions that offer or were interested in offering EPT, as identified through our prior research. We developed and piloted an interview guide based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using a thematic analysis. Themes were developed through iterative coding and team discussion. Results: Participant-reported barriers to implementing EPT included perceived legal liability, unclear clinical workflows, electronic health record (EHR) challenges when prescribing for a non-patient, ambiguity regarding duty to the partner, concerns about patient safety, and sexual health stigma. Facilitators included defined task-sharing, streamlined EHR processes, and leadership support. Participants emphasized the ED's potential to expand access to care for high-risk populations, provided that EPT implementation did not disrupt clinical operations. Conclusions: Understanding barriers and facilitators to EPT in EDs can inform the development of effective implementation strategies. While non-traditional prescribing processes pose challenges to routine adoption, experiences from EDs with established protocols suggest that these obstacles can be overcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.