Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41001499›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025

Optimal cutoff, cognitive impairment diagnostic performance, reliability and concurrent validity of the Ascertaining Dementia 8 (AD8) questionnaire among Latinos.

Jaime Perales-Puchalt, Adam Parks, Tina Lewandowski, Jeffrey M Burns, Eric D Vidoni

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jaime Perales-PuchaltAlzheimer's Disease Research Center; Department of Neurology; University of Kansas Medical Center; Fairway, KS, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1013-7847
Adam ParksAlzheimer's Disease Research Center; Department of Neurology; University of Kansas Medical Center; Fairway, KS, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7159-688X
Tina LewandowskiAlzheimer's Disease Research Center; Department of Neurology; University of Kansas Medical Center; Fairway, KS, USA.
Jeffrey M BurnsAlzheimer's Disease Research Center; Department of Neurology; University of Kansas Medical Center; Fairway, KS, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7609-8954
Eric D VidoniAlzheimer's Disease Research Center; Department of Neurology; University of Kansas Medical Center; Fairway, KS, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5181-7131

Funding

RADx-UP: Improving the Response of Local Urban and Rural Communities to Disparities in Covid-19 TestingUL1TR002366 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI Mario Castro, JAMES STEVEN LEEDER · 2017 to 2026
$44.3M
University of Kansas Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (KU ADRC)P30AG072973 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI Mohammad Haeri · 2021 to 2026
$25.3M
University of Kansas Alzheimer's Disease Core CentersP30AG035982 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI MAHNKEN, JONATHAN D · 2011 to 2020
$16.6M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002366NIA NIH HHS P30 AG035982NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072973
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Ascertaining Dementia 8 (AD8) is a brief informant- or self-administered questionnaire designed to screen for cognitive impairment, offering several advantages over performance-based screening tests. We analyzed cross-sectional data from a non-probabilistic sample of English- and Spanish-speaking Latinos who were either cognitively unimpaired or had a research diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment or dementia. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, and the Youden Index was used to determine the optimal cutoff score. Internal consistency was tested with the Kuder-Richardson Formula 20, and concurrent validity with correlations to the Clinical Dementia Rating scale, Mini-Mental State Exam, and Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores. Among 46 participants, the optimal cutoff was 3 or higher for the total sample and in both language groups. At this threshold, the AD8 showed a sensitivity of 73.7% and specificity of 85.2%, with an area under the curve of 0.843. The AD8 achieved good internal consistency of 0.872 and demonstrated correlations in the expected directions with the cognitive impairment measures. The Spanish version generally outperformed the English version. The AD8 questionnaire has adequate psychometric properties and diagnostic performance among US Latinos. To our knowledge, this is the first manuscript to validate the AD8 among US Latinos. These findings support its use in healthcare settings and its applicability for multiple research purposes.

Indexed as

assessmentCognitive impairmentdementiaLatinosscreening

Identifiers

PMID41001499
PMCPMC12458500

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.