ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2025
Unbiased Enhanced Sampling in Molecular Dynamics via Simultaneously Accelerating Diffusion in Multiple Low-Dimensional Collective Variable Spaces.
Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations face significant challenges in capturing rare events hindered by high energy barriers. While traditional enhanced sampling methods─whether biased or unbiased─typically rely on collective variables (CVs) for guidance, identifying optimal CVs for complex systems remains a formidable task. Here we propose a novel unbiased enhanced sampling methodology that circumvents the CV-related challenge through an iterative approach: projecting unbiased sampling data onto multiple low-dimensional CV spaces to calculate their sampling density distributions, integrating these distributions to guide subsequent sampling, and repeating the cycle. Conceptualizing MD-based conformational sampling as diffusion in high-dimensional space implies that our methodology accelerates diffusive exploration in all relevant CV spaces simultaneously. This method overcomes the exponential efficiency decay in high-dimensional CV spaces while offering several key advantages over existing methods: (1) it applies all CV guidance to the same unbiased ensemble, eliminating the need for replica exchange; (2) it accelerates diffusion in multiple CV spaces simultaneously, rather than being confined to one-dimensional "tube"-like pathway-based CVs, thus making it applicable to general multibasin systems. In addition, the method's ability to dynamically adjust CV spaces during sampling, along with its provision of well-classified, high-quality unbiased ensembles, greatly facilitates on-the-fly CV generation. In summary, this method provides a new paradigm for addressing CV-related challenges by leveraging the synergistic interplay between unbiased sampling and CV algorithms: On one hand, unbiased sampling enables simultaneous utilization of multiple CVs and enhances the effectiveness of CV generation methods while preserving the primary advantage─low CV dependence (yielding accurate results even with imperfect CVs). On the other hand, the optimized CV guidance effectively resolves the CV-related efficiency problems of unbiased sampling. As an additional benefit, the method provides weighted trajectory ensembles that retain complete system information. Validations through high-dimensional/multibasin model potentials and a coarse-grained protein system demonstrate the method's capability to accurately extract both thermodynamic properties (e.g., free energy landscapes) and kinetic properties (e.g., transition rates) with remarkable sampling efficiency.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.