Evidence mapPaperPMID 41002036Full record

ReviewAnnals of neurology2026

Back Again to the Future: A New Era for Cerebroprotection.

Patrick Lyden

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Patrick LydenDepartment of Physiology and Neuroscience, Zilkha Neurogenetic Institute of the Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6170-4042

Funding

The NIH SPAN Coordinating CenterU24NS130600 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · 2024 to 2025
$2.0M
NINDS NIH HHS U24 NS130600
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In multiple disease areas, neurology has failed to translate promising treatments from positive preclinical studies to successful clinical trial results. Despite this history, we persist in testing new, putative neuroprotectants using the same concepts, approaches, and methods without much modification. Recent novel data and new concepts offer an opportunity to break with past doctrine decisively, and open a new era of different approaches, methods, and strategies for studying future protections for brain injury. Cerebroprotection is a fresh framework for designing neurological therapy that targets glia and vascular cells, in addition to neurons. ANN NEUROL 2026;99:19-34.

Indexed as

Brain InjuriesNeuroprotective AgentsAnimalsHumansNeuroprotective Agents

Identifiers

PMID41002036
PMCPMC12946611

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.