ArticleThe International journal of health planning and management2026
Driving Innovation: The Impact of National Health Policies on Optometry Research in East Asia.
Article in The International journal of health planning and management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Driving Innovation: The Impact of National Health Policies on Optometry Research in East Asia.The International journal of health planning and management · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study examines the optometric research landscape in three East Asian countries-China, Japan, and Korea-analysing how research trends align with each country's national health strategies. By evaluating published articles and reviews from national journals between 2006 March 2025, we identify key areas of focus, including paediatric optometry, refractive errors, and advanced diagnostic techniques. China's research emphasises pathogenesis and retinal diseases, driven by its aging population and high prevalence of chronic conditions, while Japan prioritises binocular vision and professional practice across all age groups. Korea focuses on accommodation, contact lenses, and the impact of digital technology on vision, reflecting its high prevalence of myopia among children. These variations are shaped by demographic trends and public health strategies. China's targeted health policy, the "China Five-Year National Plan for Eye Health 2016-2020," has directly influenced domestic research, particularly in artificial intelligence and diagnostics. In contrast, Japan's "Vision Health Care 2035" and Korea's "National Health Plan 2030" have had a more limited effect on shaping optometry research, with trends driven more by societal needs-such as Japan's aging population and Korea's focus on children's digital device use. The findings highlight how China's policy-driven approach directly influences research priorities, while in Japan and Korea, research responds more to demographic shifts. This comparative analysis underscores the importance of targeted national policies in advancing healthcare innovation and shaping research directions in optometry. This study offers actionable insight into how targeted health policies, demographic transitions, and clinical practice models shape national optometric research agendas, providing a framework for aligning future research with healthcare goals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.