Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41002306›Full record

ReviewBiosensors2025

Pathophysiological Associations and Measurement Techniques of Red Blood Cell Deformability.

Minhui Liang, Dawei Ming, Jianwei Zhong, Choo Sheriel Shannon, William Rojas-Carabali, Kajal Agrawal, Ye Ai, Rupesh Agrawal

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biosensors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Flavonoids: Hemorheological effects and mechanisms of action.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Minhui LiangSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2577-2405
Dawei MingSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China.
Jianwei ZhongPillar of Engineering Product Development, Singapore University of Technology and Design, 8 Somapah Road, Singapore 487372, Singapore.
Choo Sheriel ShannonNational Healthcare Group Eye Institute, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore 308433, Singapore.ORCID 0009-0005-1820-0654
William Rojas-CarabaliLee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 308232, Singapore.
Kajal AgrawalLee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 308232, Singapore.
Ye AiPillar of Engineering Product Development, Singapore University of Technology and Design, 8 Somapah Road, Singapore 487372, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-8638-1649
Rupesh AgrawalNational Healthcare Group Eye Institute, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore 308433, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Red blood cell (RBC), accounting for approximately 45% of total blood volume, are essential for oxygen delivery and carbon dioxide removal. Their unique biconcave morphology, high surface area-to-volume ratio, and remarkable deformability enable them to navigate microvessels narrower than their resting diameter, ensuring efficient microcirculation. RBC deformability is primarily determined by membrane viscoelasticity, cytoplasmic viscosity, and cell geometry, all of which can be altered under various physiological and pathological conditions. Reduced deformability is a hallmark of numerous diseases, including sickle cell disease, malaria, diabetes mellitus, sepsis, ischemia-reperfusion injury, and storage lesions in transfused blood. As these mechanical changes often precede overt clinical symptoms, RBC deformability is increasingly recognized as a sensitive biomarker for disease diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment monitoring. Over the past decades, diverse techniques have been developed to measure RBC deformability. These include single-cell methods such as micropipette aspiration, optical tweezers, atomic force microscopy, magnetic twisting cytometry, and quantitative phase imaging; bulk approaches like blood viscometry, ektacytometry, filtration assays, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate; and emerging microfluidic platforms capable of high-throughput, physiologically relevant measurements. Each method captures distinct aspects of RBC mechanics, offering unique advantages and limitations. This review synthesizes current knowledge on the pathophysiological significance of RBC deformability and the methods for its measurement. We discuss disease contexts in which deformability is altered, outline mechanical models describing RBC viscoelasticity, and provide a comparative analysis of measurement techniques. Our aim is to guide the selection of appropriate approaches for research and clinical applications, and to highlight opportunities for developing robust, clinically translatable diagnostic tools.

Indexed as

Biosensing TechniquesErythrocyte DeformabilityErythrocytesHumansbiomedical researchdeformabilityred blood cell

Identifiers

PMID41002306
PMCPMC12467927

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.