ReviewBiosensors2025
Progress and Prospects in FRET for the Investigation of Protein-Protein Interactions.
Review in Biosensors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mapping the dynamic plant interactome: from in vitro assays to in vivo quantitative approaches.Plant methods · 2026Review
- Targeting Undruggable Protein Interactions with DNA Aptamers: Inhibition of the Interaction BetweenInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Machine Learning Methods for Protein-Protein Interaction Prediction Based on Noncovalent Interactions.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Bound or unbound: mapping and monitoring receptor oligomerization by time-resolved fluorescence live-cell imaging.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2026Article
- Capturing protein-protein interactions in plants: recent advances, challenges, and opportunities.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2026Review
- Combining Fluorescence and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Drug Discovery-A Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Protein-protein interactions (PPIs) play a crucial role in various biological processes, including signal transduction, transcriptional regulation, and metabolic pathways. Over the years, many methods have been developed to study PPIs, such as yeast two-hybrid (Y2H), co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP), pull-down assays, and surface plasmon resonance (SPR). However, each of these techniques has its own limitations, including false positives, a lack of specific binding partners, and restricted interaction zones. Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) has emerged as a powerful technique for investigating PPIs, offering several advantages over traditional methods. Recent advancements in fluorescence microscopy have further enhanced its application in PPI studies. In this review, we summarize recent developments in FRET-based approaches and their applications in PPIs research over the past five years, including conventional FRET, time-resolved FRET (TR-FRET), fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy-FRET (FLIM-FRET), single-molecule FRET (smFRET), fluorescence cross-correlation spectroscopy FRET (FCCS-FRET), and provide guidance on selecting the most appropriate method for PPIs studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.