ReviewGels (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Biological Models for Evaluating Hydrogel-Based Formulations in Wound Healing.
Review in Gels (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Olive Mill Wastewater-Loaded Polysaccharide Hydrogels as Potential Antibacterial Films for Wound Healing.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Smart responsive hydrogels combined with AI design for tumor therapy.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2026Review
- From Smart Hydrogel Design to 4D-Printed Scaffolds: Emerging Paradigms in Precision Drug Delivery and Regenerative Wound Therapy.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Next-Generation Hydrogels Integrating Natural Antioxidants and Microbiome Modulators for Improved Cancer Management.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- A Natural Antioxidant-Rich Hydrogel Formulation withGels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A novel integratedRegenerative biomaterials · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Skin, the largest organ of the human body, serves as a critical physico-chemical barrier against environmental insults and plays essential roles in hydration, thermoregulation, immune defense, and metabolic functions. Wound healing is a complex, multistage biological process involving hemostasis, inflammation, proliferation, and remodeling. Hydrogels have emerged as a promising class of wound dressings due to their high moisture retention, biocompatibility, and ability to mimic the extracellular matrix, thereby supporting accelerated healing and controlled drug delivery. This review provides a comprehensive overview of current hydrogel types-classified by origin, crosslinking mechanisms, and responsiveness to stimuli-and evaluates their use in experimental research on in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo wound healing models. Furthermore, clinical applications of hydrogels in wound therapy are discussed. Advances in semisynthetic and stimuli-responsive hydrogels, along with improved testing models, offer enhanced therapeutic potential and underscore the need for continued innovation to optimize wound care outcomes and alleviate healthcare burdens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.