Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41002498›Full record

ReviewGels (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Click Chemistry-Based Hydrogels for Tissue Engineering.

Soheil Sojdeh, Amirhosein Panjipour, Amal Yaghmour, Zohreh Arabpour, Ali R Djalilian

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gels (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A practical toolbox for modelling fibrosis in vitro.Nature biomedical engineering · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Soheil SojdehDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2729-4163
Amirhosein PanjipourDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Amal YaghmourDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.ORCID 0009-0009-5555-6421
Zohreh ArabpourDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.ORCID 0009-0004-0996-4014
Ali R DjalilianDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.

Funding

Translational Core for Therapeutic and Diagnostic DevelopmentP30EY001792 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI SHUKLA, DEEPAK · 1985 to 2025
$14.8M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY001792
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Click chemistry has become a powerful and flexible approach for designing hydrogels used in tissue engineering thanks to its high specificity, fast reaction rates, and compatibility with biological systems. In this review, we introduce the core principles of click chemistry, including efficiency, orthogonality, and modularity, and highlight the main types of reactions commonly used in hydrogel formation, such as azide-alkyne c-cloadditions, thiol-ene/yne reactions, Diels-Alder cycloadditions, and tetrazine-norbornene couplings. These chemistries allow researchers to create covalently crosslinked hydrogels that are injectable, responsive to environmental stimuli, biodegradable, or multifunctional. We also explore strategies to enhance bioactivity, such as incorporating peptides, growth factors, or extracellular matrix components, and enabling precise spatial and temporal control over biological cues. Click-based hydrogels have shown promise across a wide range of tissue engineering applications, from cartilage and skin repair to neural regeneration, corneal healing, and cardiovascular scaffolds, as well as in 3D bioprinting technologies. Despite the many advantages of click chemistry such as mild reaction conditions and customizable material properties, some challenges remain, including concerns around copper toxicity, the cost of specialized reagents, and scalability. Finally, we discuss the status of clinical translation, regulatory considerations, and future directions, including integration with advanced bio fabrication methods, the design of dual-click systems, and the emerging role of in vivo click chemistry in creating next-generation biomaterials.

Indexed as

click chemistrycrosslinked hydrogeltissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID41002498
PMCPMC12469877

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.