Evidence mapPaperPMID 41002613Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2025

Platelet-to-Lymphocyte and Glucose-to-Lymphocyte Ratios as Prognostic Markers in Hospitalized Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Christos Kofos, Andreas S Papazoglou, Barbara Fyntanidou, Athanasios Samaras, Panagiotis Stachteas, Athina Nasoufidou, Aikaterini Apostolopoulou, Paschalis Karakasis, Alexandra Arvanitaki, Marios G Bantidos and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Christos KofosSecond Department of Cardiology, General Hospital 'Hippokration', Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Konstantinoupoleos 49, 54642 Thessaloniki, Greece.
Andreas S PapazoglouDepartment of Cardiology, Athens Naval Hospital, 11521 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-4981-8121
Barbara FyntanidouDepartment of Emergency Medicine, AHEPA University Hospital, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-0019-0134
Athanasios SamarasSecond Department of Cardiology, General Hospital 'Hippokration', Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Konstantinoupoleos 49, 54642 Thessaloniki, Greece.
Panagiotis StachteasSecond Department of Cardiology, General Hospital 'Hippokration', Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Konstantinoupoleos 49, 54642 Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-1657-4696
Athina NasoufidouSecond Department of Cardiology, General Hospital 'Hippokration', Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Konstantinoupoleos 49, 54642 Thessaloniki, Greece.
Aikaterini ApostolopoulouDepartment of Emergency Medicine, AHEPA University Hospital, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-6391-3478
Paschalis KarakasisSecond Department of Cardiology, General Hospital 'Hippokration', Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Konstantinoupoleos 49, 54642 Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-3561-5713
Alexandra ArvanitakiSecond Department of Cardiology, General Hospital 'Hippokration', Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Konstantinoupoleos 49, 54642 Thessaloniki, Greece.
Marios G BantidosDepartment of Emergency Medicine, AHEPA University Hospital, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0009-0001-9409-388X
Dimitrios V MoysidisMedical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece.
Nikolaos StalikasCardiovascular Center, AZORG Ziekenhuis, Moorselbaan 164, 9300 Aalst, Belgium.
Dimitrios PatouliasSecond Propaedeutic Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences Aristotle, University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-6899-684X
Apostolos TzikasSecond Department of Cardiology, General Hospital 'Hippokration', Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Konstantinoupoleos 49, 54642 Thessaloniki, Greece.
George KassimisSecond Department of Cardiology, General Hospital 'Hippokration', Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Konstantinoupoleos 49, 54642 Thessaloniki, Greece.
Nikolaos FragakisSecond Department of Cardiology, General Hospital 'Hippokration', Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Konstantinoupoleos 49, 54642 Thessaloniki, Greece.
Efstratios KaragiannidisSecond Department of Cardiology, General Hospital 'Hippokration', Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Konstantinoupoleos 49, 54642 Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-8328-5942

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNovel and accessible biomarkers may add to the existing risk stratification schemes in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and glucose-to-lymphocyte ratio (GLR) have emerged as potential indicators of systemic inflammation and metabolic stress, both of which are pivotal in ACS pathophysiology. The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic significance of the PLR and GLR in patients with ACS.

methodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study of patients hospitalized with ACS between 2017 and 2023 at Hippokration Hospital of Thessaloniki, Greece. PLR and GLR were calculated from admission blood samples. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Logistic and Cox regression models were used to investigate the associations of PLR and GLR with all-cause mortality. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, Kaplan-Meier survival curves, and restricted cubic spline (RCS) modeling were also applied.

resultsIn total, 853 patients (median age: 65 years, 72.3% males) were included. Higher PLR and GLR were independently associated with increased risk of long-term mortality [adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) for PLR: 1.007, 95% CI: 1.005-1.008; and for GLR: aOR = 1.006, 95% CI: 1.003-1.008]. The optimal cut-off values were 191.92 for PLR and 66.80 for GLR. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses confirmed significantly reduced survival in patients with GLR and PLR values exceeding these thresholds. RCS analysis revealed non-linear relationships, with mortality risk rising sharply at higher levels of both markers. PLR showed superior prognostic performance (AUC: 0.673, 95% CI: 0.614-0.723) compared to GLR (AUC: 0.602, 95% CI: 0.551-0.653).

conclusionsWhile PLR demonstrated greater predictive accuracy, both PLR and GLR were consistently associated with mortality and may provide complementary prognostic information. Incorporating those ratios into routine clinical assessment may improve risk stratification, particularly in resource-limited settings or for patients without traditional risk factors.

Indexed as

acute coronary syndromeall-cause mortalityGLRglucose-to-lymphocyte ratioinflammatory biomarkersplatelet-to-lymphocyte ratioPLRprognostic ratios

Identifiers

PMID41002613
PMCPMC12470989

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.