ReviewJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2025
AI Applied to Cardiac Magnetic Resonance for Precision Medicine in Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review.
Review in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancements in Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Innovations, Challenges, and Future Directions.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Application of 3T contrast-enhanced Dixon water-fat separation coronary magnetic resonance angiography with artificial intelligence-assisted compressed sensing on coronary artery aneurysm in children with Kawasaki disease.Translational pediatrics · 2026Article
- Advances in Cardiovascular Imaging: A Platform to Share Recent Research Findings Through Utilization of Advanced Imaging Technologies.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Article
- Regenerative and molecular therapies for myocardial repair (Review).Medicine internationalReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging has become a key tool in evaluating myocardial injury secondary to coronary artery disease (CAD), providing detailed assessments of cardiac morphology, function, and tissue composition. The integration of artificial intelligence (AI), including machine learning and deep learning techniques, has enhanced the diagnostic capabilities of CMR by automating segmentation, improving image interpretation, and accelerating clinical workflows. Radiomics, through the extraction of quantitative imaging features, complements AI by revealing sub-visual patterns relevant to disease characterization. This systematic review analyzed AI applications in CMR for CAD. A structured search was conducted in MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Scopus up to 17 March 2025, following PRISMA guidelines and quality-assessed with the CLAIM checklist. A total of 106 studies were included: 46 on classification, 19 using radiomics, and 41 on segmentation. AI models were used to classify CAD vs. controls, predict major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), arrhythmias, and post-infarction remodeling. Radiomics enabled differentiation of acute vs. chronic infarction and prediction of microvascular obstruction, sometimes from non-contrast CMR. Segmentation achieved high performance for myocardium (DSC up to 0.95), but scar and edema delineation were more challenging. Reported performance was moderate-to-high across tasks (classification AUC = 0.66-1.00; segmentation DSC = 0.43-0.97; radiomics AUC = 0.57-0.99). Despite promising results, limitations included small or overlapping datasets. In conclusion, AI and radiomics offer substantial potential to support diagnosis and prognosis of CAD through advanced CMR image analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.