Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41002798›Full record

ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2025

IEGS-BoT: An Integrated Detection-Tracking Framework for Cellular Dynamics Analysis in Medical Imaging.

Shuqin Tu, Weidian Chen, Liang Mao, Quan Zhang, Fang Yuan, Jiaying Du

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shuqin TuCollege of Mathematics and Informatics, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5844-2360
Weidian ChenCollege of Mathematics and Informatics, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.
Liang MaoUndergraduate School of Artificial Intelligence, Shenzhen Polytechnic University, Shenzhen 518055, China.
Quan ZhangCollege of Mechanical Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China.
Fang YuanCollege of Computer Science and Electronic Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China.
Jiaying DuCollege of Mathematics and Informatics, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.

Funding

Guangdong Province Rural Science and Technology Commissioner project, cloud platform based agricultural products e-commerce platform construction and promotion and application KTP20200219Guangdong Province Rural Science and Technology Commissioner project, zen tea reliable traceability and intelligent planting key technology research and development, promotion and application KTP20210199
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell detection-tracking tasks are vital for biomedical image analysis with potential applications in clinical diagnosis and treatment. However, it poses challenges such as ambiguous boundaries and complex backgrounds in microscopic video sequences, leading to missed detection, false detection, and loss of tracking. Therefore, we propose an enhanced multiple object tracking algorithm IEGS-YOLO + BoT-SORT, named IEGS-BoT, to address these issues. Firstly, the IEGS-YOLO detector is developed for cell detection tasks. It uses the iEMA module, which effectively combines the global information to enhance the local information. Then, we replace the traditional convolutional network in the neck of the YOLO11n with GSConv to reduce the computational complexity while maintaining accuracy. Finally, the BoT-SORT tracker is selected to enhance the accuracy of bounding box positioning through camera motion compensation and Kalman filter. We conduct experiments on the CTMC dataset, and the results show that in the detection phase, the map50 (mean Average Precision) and map50-95 values are 73.2% and 32.6%, outperforming the YOLO11n detector by 1.1% and 0.6%, respectively. In the tracking phase, using the IEGS-BoT method, the multiple objects tracking accuracy (MOTA), higher order tracking accuracy (HOTA), and identification F1 (IDF1) reach 53.97%, 51.30%, and 67.52%, respectively. Compared with the base BoT-SORT, the proposed method achieves improvements of 1.19%, 0.23%, and 1.29% in MOTA, HOTA, and IDF1, respectively. ID switch (IDSW) decreases from 1170 to 894, which demonstrates significant mitigation of identity confusion. This approach effectively addresses the challenges posed by object loss and identity switching in cell tracking, providing a more reliable solution for medical image analysis.

Indexed as

BoT-SORTcell trackingIEGS-YOLOmultiple object tracking (MOT)YOLO11n

Identifiers

PMID41002798
PMCPMC12467273

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.