ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2025
DRIME: A Distributed Data-Guided RIME Algorithm for Numerical Optimization Problems.
Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To address the shortcomings of the RIME algorithm's weak global exploration ability, insufficient information exchange among populations, and limited population diversity, this work proposes a distributed data-guided RIME algorithm called DRIME. First, this paper proposes a data-distribution-driven guided learning strategy that enhances information exchange among populations and dynamically guides populations to exploit or explore. Then, a soft-rime search phase based on weighted averaging is proposed, which balances the development and exploration of RIME by alternating with the original strategy. Finally, a candidate pool is utilized to replace the optimal reference point of the hard-rime puncture mechanism to enrich the diversity of the population and reduce the risk of falling into local optima. To evaluate the performance of the DRIME algorithm, parameter sensitivity analysis, policy effectiveness analysis, and two comparative analyses are performed on the CEC-2017 test set and the CEC-2022 test set. The parameter sensitivity analysis identifies the optimal parameter settings for the DRIME algorithm. The strategy effectiveness analysis confirms the effectiveness of the improved strategies. In comparison with ACGRIME, TERIME, IRIME, DNMRIME, GLSRIME, and HERIME on the CEC-2017 test set, the DRIME algorithm achieves Friedman rankings of 1.517, 1.069, 1.138, and 1.069 in different dimensions. In comparison with EOSMA, GLS-MPA, ISGTOA, EMTLBO, LSHADE-SPACMA, and APSM-jSO on the CEC-2022 test set, the DRIME algorithm achieves Friedman rankings of 2.167 and 1.917 in 10 and 30 dimensions, respectively. In addition, the DRIME algorithm achieved an average ranking of 1.23 in engineering constraint optimization problems, far surpassing other comparison algorithms. In conclusion, the numerical optimization experiments successfully illustrate that the DRIME algorithm has excellent search capability and can provide satisfactory solutions to a wide range of optimization problems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.