Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41003048›Full record

ArticleNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles Affect the Genomic and Redox Status of Chicken Embryo-Influence of Shape.

Bartłomiej Dominiak, Julita Rosowska, Agnieszka Wal, Alicja Majewska, Bartłomiej S Witkowski, Łukasz Wachnicki, Jarosław Kaszewski, Anna Słońska, Joanna Cymerys, Mikołaj A Gralak and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. The Role of Phenolic Profile of Salt-Stressed Duckweed (Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Bartłomiej DominiakDepartment of Physiological Sciences, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, Nowoursynowska 159, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-0337-5081
Julita RosowskaDepartment of Physiological Sciences, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, Nowoursynowska 159, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland.
Agnieszka WalDepartment of Plant Physiology, Institute of Biology, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-0018-8985
Alicja MajewskaDepartment of Physiological Sciences, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, Nowoursynowska 159, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-9815-7844
Bartłomiej S WitkowskiInstitute of Physics PAS, Polish Academy of Sciences, Al. Lotników 32/46, 02-668 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-0108-6902
Łukasz WachnickiInstitute of Physics PAS, Polish Academy of Sciences, Al. Lotników 32/46, 02-668 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-0428-4974
Jarosław KaszewskiInstitute of Physics PAS, Polish Academy of Sciences, Al. Lotników 32/46, 02-668 Warsaw, Poland.
Anna SłońskaDivision of Microbiology, Department of Preclinical Sciences, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, Ciszewskiego 8, 02-786 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-9872-3017
Joanna CymerysDivision of Microbiology, Department of Preclinical Sciences, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, Ciszewskiego 8, 02-786 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5273-3930
Mikołaj A GralakDepartment of Physiological Sciences, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, Nowoursynowska 159, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3008-4917
Marek GodlewskiInstitute of Physics PAS, Polish Academy of Sciences, Al. Lotników 32/46, 02-668 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1701-5458
Michał M GodlewskiDepartment of Physiological Sciences, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, Nowoursynowska 159, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5479-207X

Funding

National Science Centre UMO-2021/41/B/NZ4/04424
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the spread of nanotechnology use in industry, exposure to nanomaterials is currently exponentially increasing. With reports indicating nanoparticles' ability to pass through key biological barriers-gastrointestinal, lung, skin, blood-brain and the placenta barriers-the question of their safety, particularly the risks associated with embryonic development, arises. The aim of this article is to verify the impact of ZnO nanoparticles, which are commonly used and considered to be safe for adult organisms on the developing embryo. In the current study, the influence of the dose and shape of ZnO nanoparticles (oval vs. long) was evaluated in the chicken embryo model. The oxidative stress (superoxide dismutase (SOD)) activity, malondialdehyde (MDA) and carbonylated protein ((CP) levels), and gene expression changes (full genomic microarray study) were tested. We found that at both doses (10 µg/mL and 100 µg/mL, 100 µL into the air chamber) neither elongated nor oval ZnO nanoparticles changed in ovo mortality. Long ZnO nanoparticles had a lesser and more delayed impact on evaluated parameters, regardless of their higher in vitro toxicity. However, both nanoparticle forms induced changes in the oxidoreductive potential and affected expression of a significant number (1487 for oval and 548 for long ZnO nanoparticles) of identified genes during early embryo development.

Indexed as

chicken embryo modelembryotoxicityfull genomic microarraysoxidative stressshape of the nanoparticlesZnO nanoparticles

Identifiers

PMID41003048
PMCPMC12472910

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.