SynthesisMedical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Management of Juvenile Fibromyalgia: A Level I Evidence-Based Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundJuvenile fibromyalgia (JFM) is a chronic pain disorder characterised by widespread musculoskeletal pain, functional impairment, fatigue, and mood disturbances. Treatment remains challenging, considering the multifactorial nature of the condition and the limited high-quality evidence supporting pharmacological or non-pharmacological interventions.
objectivesThis review aimed to critically appraise level I evidence from randomised controlled trials assessing the efficacy and safety of pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments for adolescents with JFM.
methodsSeven published peer-reviewed clinical trials were examined, including studies investigating duloxetine, milnacipran, pregabalin, cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT), and the integrated Fibromyalgia Integrative Training Teens (FIT) program, which combines CBT with neuromuscular training. Outcomes of interest included pain intensity, functional disability, depression symptoms, physical activity, and adverse events.
resultsPharmacological agents such as duloxetine, milnacipran, and pregabalin demonstrated modest improvements in pain, but failed to produce consistent benefits in function or mood, and were associated with a high incidence of adverse effects. CBT significantly improved functional disability and depression symptoms, yet it had a limited impact on pain reduction or objectively measured activity levels. The FIT Teens program showed superior outcomes in pain intensity and biomechanical function compared to CBT alone, suggesting a synergistic effect of combining psychological and physical reconditioning strategies.
conclusionsCurrent evidence supports the use of multimodal treatment approaches in JFM. Non-pharmacological interventions, particularly when integrated with structured exercise, offer meaningful benefits with minimal safety concerns. Larger, methodologically rigorous trials are needed to establish optimal treatment pathways and long-term outcomes for this complex and underserved paediatric population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.