ReviewJournal of functional biomaterials2025
A Histological and Clinical Evaluation of Long-Term Outcomes of Bovine Bone-Derived Xenografts in Oral Surgery: A Systematic Review.
Review in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dental implant rehabilitation after jaw tumor resection: a mini-review of protocols and quality of life across treatment modalities.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Guided Alveolar Ridge Preservation (G-ARP) with a Subperiosteal Cortical Lamina: A Retrospective Observational Case Series.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Pilot Case Series of Lateral Ridge Augmentation Using a Collagenated Porcine-Derived Xenograft: Clinical, Histological, and Remodeling Outcomes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Platelet Concentrates in Alveolar and Periodontal Bone Regeneration: Adjunctive Benefits and Clinical Comparability with Conventional Approaches: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Bone Substitutes in Alveolar Ridge Augmentation: A Narrative Literature Review.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Review
- Standardized Photobiomodulation Dosimetry Targeting the Base of Calvarial Critical-Sized Defects for Bone Regeneration: A Preclinical RCT Comparing Flattop vs. Gaussian Beam Profiles, with or Without Bio-OssJournal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Emerging Biomaterials for Maxillary Sinus Augmentation: From In Vitro Insights to In Vivo Clinical Translation.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Sinus Lift with Collagenated Porcine Xenograft in Severely Atrophic Posterior Maxillae: Case Series with Histologic Correlation and Long-Term Outcomes.Dentistry journal · 2025Article
- The tooth transformer® revolution: autologous dentin biomaterials and platelet concentrates in oral regeneration. A parallel narrative systematic review.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2025Review
- Synergistic HA-tooth graft composite promotes rapid alveolar bone healing via IL-6 suppression and OCN enhancement.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBovine bone-derived xenografts are widely used in regenerative dental procedures due to their osteoconductive properties and volumetric stability. However, their long-term behavior and biological integration remain a subject of debate. This systematic review aims to critically assess the histological and clinical outcomes associated with bovine xenografts over extended follow-up periods.
methodsAn electronic search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, including studies published in the English language from 2005 to 2025 for a total of 217 records, which were initially identified from PubMed, Scopus, and Wos.
resultsAfter duplicate removal, following title/abstract screening and full-text evaluation, 11 studies met the inclusion criteria. These studies reported on the use of bovine-derived xenografts in clinical contexts, assessing parameters such as graft integration, histological remodeling, complication incidence (e.g., chronic inflammation or foreign body reactions), and implant success rates over time.
conclusionsThe current evidence suggests that bovine-derived xenografts, particularly Bio-Oss
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.