ReviewJournal of functional biomaterials2025
Recent Advances in 3D Bioprinting of Porous Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering: A Narrative and Critical Review.
Review in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Natural Bioactive-Based Advanced Wound Dressings for Diabetic Wound Healing: A Systematic Review of Emerging Biomaterial Platforms.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Pooled it
- 3D-Printing of Magnetoactive Gelatin-Alginate Scaffolds.Pharmaceutics · 2026Article
- Volumetric Infiltration of Brushite and Monetite Cements into Laser Powder Bed Fusion Ti-6Al-4V Lattices: A Feasibility Study of Lattice Geometry and Cement Formulation.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Influence of Ti-6Al-4V Scaffold Architecture on Early Cellular Responses Relevant to Bone Regeneration.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Structure-Property Evolution of Cubic and Gyroid PLA Scaffolds During In Vitro Degradation Under Physiologically Relevant Conditions.Polymers · 2026Article
- Croaker Fish Bone-Derived Hydroxyapatite as a Sustainable Source for 3D-Printed Scaffolds for Bone Regeneration.Marine drugs · 2026Article
- Stimuli-Responsive Piezoelectric Scaffold as an AdvancedACS omega · 2026Article
- Comprehensive Review on Thermoplastic Polyurethane: Applications in Wound Healing and Smart Healthcare.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Copper-Doped Silicate Porous Architectures for Hard Tissue Engineering.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- The Future of Protozoan Infection Research: 3D Cell Culture and beyond.ACS infectious diseases · 2026Review
- Scaffold Material-Architecture Design Rules Linking Mechanics and Early Osteogenesis in PCL/β-TCP Grid, Honeycomb, and Gyroid Lattices.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Influence of Boron Nitride Nanosheets on the Properties of Gelatin-Chitosan Bioinks for Extrusion-Based 3D Bioprinting.Biopolymers · 2026Article
- From Smart Hydrogel Design to 4D-Printed Scaffolds: Emerging Paradigms in Precision Drug Delivery and Regenerative Wound Therapy.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Green and Scalable Manufacturing of Biodegradable Polymer Scaffolds: Solvent-Free Processing, Supercritical COPolymers · 2026Review
- Bioactive Hydrogels and Scaffolds for Oral Mucosal Regeneration After Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Therapy: A Comprehensive Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Mastoid Obliteration After Canal Wall Down Mastoidectomy Using Tissue Engineering Approaches with Polymers, Mesenchymal Stem Cells, and Bioactive Molecules: A Systematic Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- A Formal Optimization-Oriented Design Framework for Predictive Extrusion-Based 3D Bioprinting.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- 3D Skeletal Scaffolds of Marine Keratosan Demosponges Origin as Renewable Sources for Bioinspiration in Modern Structural Biomimetics and Tissue Engineering.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Treatment of femoral defects in rats with collagen and elastin polymers combined with hydroxyapatite and bone morphogenetic protein.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Beyond monolayers: a comparative analysis of 2D cell cultures and 3DFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
3D bioprinting has emerged as a key tool in tissue engineering by facilitating the creation of customized scaffolds with properties tailored to specific needs. Among the design parameters, porosity stands out as a determining factor, as it directly influences critical mechanical and biological properties such as nutrient diffusion, cell adhesion and structural integrity. This review comprehensively analyses the state of the art in scaffold design, emphasizing how porosity-related parameters such as pore size, geometry, distribution and interconnectivity affect cellular behavior and mechanical performance. It also addresses advances in manufacturing methods, such as additive manufacturing and computer-aided design (CAD), which allow the development of scaffolds with hierarchical structures and controlled porosity. In addition, the use of computational modelling, in particular finite element analysis (FEA), as an essential predictive tool to optimize the design of scaffolds under physiological conditions is highlighted. This narrative review analyzed 112 core articles retrieved primarily from Scopus (2014-2025) to provide a comprehensive and up-to-date synthesis. Despite recent progress, significant challenges persist, including the lack of standardized methodologies for characterizing and comparing porosity parameters across different studies. This review identifies these gaps and suggests future research directions, such as the development of unified characterization and classification systems and the enhancement of nanoscale resolution in bioprinting technologies. By integrating structural design with biological functionality, this review underscores the transformative potential of porosity research applied to 3D bioprinting, positioning it as a key strategy to meet current clinical needs in tissue engineering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.