ArticleJournal of functional biomaterials2025
Data-Driven Design and Additive Manufacturing of Patient-Specific Lattice Titanium Scaffolds for Mandibular Bone Reconstruction.
Article in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sustainable nanomaterials for precision dental medicine: green synthesis, therapeutic applications, and future directions.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
- Advances in Functional Scaffolds for Bone and Joint Surgery.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The reconstruction of segmental bone defects requires patient-specific scaffolds that combine mechanical safety, biological functionality, and rapid manufacturing. We converted CT-derived mandibular geometry into a functionally graded Ti-6Al-4V lattice and optimised porosity, screw layout, and strut thickness through a cyber-physical loop that joins high-fidelity FEM, millisecond ANN, and a BN for uncertainty quantification. Fifteen candidate scaffolds were fabricated by direct metal laser sintering and hot isostatic pressing and were mechanically tested. FEM predicted stress and stiffness with 98% accuracy; the ANN reproduced these outputs with 94% fidelity while evaluating 10,000 designs in real time, and the BN limited failure probability to <3% under worst-case loads. The selected 55-65% porosity design reduced titanium use by 15%, shortened development time by 25% and raised multi-objective optimisation efficiency by 20% relative to a solid-plate baseline, while resisting a 600 N bite with a peak von Mises stress of 225 MPa and micromotion < 150 µm. Integrating physics-based simulation, AI speed, and probabilistic rigour yields a validated, additively manufactured scaffold that meets surgical timelines and biomechanical requirements, offering a transferable blueprint for functional scaffolds in bone and joint surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.