Trial reportNeuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society2025
Noninvasive Vagus Nerve Stimulation Reduces Withdrawal-Related Affective Distress and Improves Functional Outcomes in Alcohol Use Disorder: A Feasibility and Acceptability Pilot Study.
Trial report in Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Review of Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Disease: Comprehensive Theory and Evidence for Mechanisms of Action.Comprehensive Physiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesAlcohol use disorder (AUD) is characterized by autonomic dysregulation and overactive brain stress systems, which manifests as pronounced negative emotional states in the absence of alcohol and can lead to functional impairment. The vagus nerve presents a promising novel treatment target for these symptoms. The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of cervical noninvasive vagal nerve stimulation (nVNS) as a new treatment for AUD, and to assess whether nVNS can alleviate withdrawal-related affective distress and improve functional outcomes. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this double-blind, randomized controlled trial, male Veterans with AUD were randomly assigned to receive active (n = 9) or sham (n = 10) nVNS at baseline, self-administered stimulation for seven days, and returned for a follow-up visit. Treatment adherence and acceptability ratings were assessed. Behavioral self-report measures of affective distress (Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ-8], State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-State, Beck Anxiety Inventory) and functional limitations (Drinker Inventory of Consequences [DrInC-2R], Brief Inventory of Psychosocial Functioning [BIPF]) were collected at baseline and follow-up. Linear mixed effects (LME) models were used to assess the impact of treatment group on outcome measures.
resultsTreatment adherence was high in both groups and did not statistically differ (94% nVNS group, 80% sham group; p = 0.14). Both groups assigned treatment acceptability ratings in the acceptable to highly acceptable range. LME results show significant group-by-time interactions for the PHQ-8 [p = 0.04], DrInC-2R [p = 0.02], and BIPF [p = 0.01]), indicating greater reductions in depressive symptoms, adverse alcohol-related consequences, and functional limitations after nVNS than with sham treatment. No statistically significant group-by-time interactions were observed for anxiety symptoms.
conclusionsTo our knowledge, this is the first study to explore cervical nVNS as a potential new treatment for AUD-related symptoms. Findings provide support for feasibility of treatment delivery and patient acceptance, and initial evidence that nVNS can achieve significant reductions in depressive symptoms in addition to adverse alcohol-related consequences and psychosocial functional limitations in AUD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.